1 answer

125 views

Visual Studio 2013
Just Mock 2014.1.1623.1
NCrunch 2.7.0.5

Currently, NCrunch is running with the Just Mock Profiler as seen here: http://snag.gy/04kqj.jpg

The instructions found here (http://www.telerik.com/help/justmock/integration-ncrunch.html) state that in order to have this work I need to setup a "Proxy process file path" in NCrunch. However, I currently do not have that set on any of my NCrunch projects, e.g., http://snag.gy/mPQCc.jpg

I would like to disable the Just Mock Profiler for some of my NCrunch projects but I am not sure how Just Mock Runner is being executed so I don't know what to change to make it stop executing using Just Mock Runner.

I am aware that I can programmatically disable the runner, but I am looking for a configuration based solution that doesn't require code changes to my tests.

General Discussions

answered on 20 Jun 2014

1 answer

476 views

Unable to perform Async Actions on Mock

So I'm trying to test out a function and it requires the use of a FindAsync function. i've boiled the code down to this example. When I run it, I get a NullReferenceExcetption from the FindAsync method. I believe that this is caused by an internal error in the arrangement of the MockSet.



[TestMethod()]

public async Task _ShipmentController_DetailsReturnsHttpNotFoundOnNullShipments()

{

//Arrange

var shipments = new List<ShipmentPlayer>

{

new ShipmentPlayer(){ShipmentID = 0},

}.AsQueryable();

var mockSet = createMockShipmentPlayerDB(shipments);

var mockContext = Mock.Create<ExportAttempt4Entities>();

Mock.Arrange(() => mockContext.ShipmentPlayersGroup).Returns(mockSet);

//Act

ShipmentPlayer query = await mockContext.FindAsync(0);

//Assert

Assert.IsNotNull(query);

}



Async set creation method:


private DbSet<ShipmentPlayer> createMockShipmentPlayerDB(IQueryable<ShipmentPlayer> chks)
{
    /*
     * This function is a helper to create ASync databases. 
     * To modify this for your DB, change the Generics (<T>)
     * to your prefferend generic
     */
    var mockSet = Mock.Create<DbSet<ShipmentPlayer>>();
 
    Mock.Arrange(() => ((IDbAsyncEnumerable<ShipmentPlayer>)mockSet).GetAsyncEnumerator())
        .Returns(new TestDbAsyncEnumerator<ShipmentPlayer>(chks.GetEnumerator()));
 
    Mock.Arrange(() => ((IQueryable<ShipmentPlayer>)mockSet).Provider)
        .Returns(new TestDbAsyncQueryProvider<ShipmentPlayer>(chks.Provider));
 
    Mock.Arrange(() => ((IQueryable<ShipmentPlayer>)mockSet).Expression).Returns(chks.Expression);
    Mock.Arrange(() => ((IQueryable<ShipmentPlayer>)mockSet).ElementType).Returns(chks.ElementType);
    Mock.Arrange(() => ((IQueryable<ShipmentPlayer>)mockSet).GetEnumerator()).Returns(chks.GetEnumerator());
    return mockSet;
}

Async Database info:

internal class TestDbAsyncQueryProvider<TEntity> : IDbAsyncQueryProvider

{

private readonly IQueryProvider _inner;

internal TestDbAsyncQueryProvider(IQueryProvider inner)

{

_inner = inner;

}

public IQueryable CreateQuery(Expression expression)

{

return new TestDbAsyncEnumerable<TEntity>(expression);

}

public IQueryable<TElement> CreateQuery<TElement>(Expression expression)

{

return new TestDbAsyncEnumerable<TElement>(expression);

}

public object Execute(Expression expression)

{

return _inner.Execute(expression);

}

public TResult Execute<TResult>(Expression expression)

{

return _inner.Execute<TResult>(expression);

}

public Task<object> ExecuteAsync(Expression expression, CancellationToken cancellationToken)

{

return Task.FromResult(Execute(expression));

}

public Task<TResult> ExecuteAsync<TResult>(Expression expression, CancellationToken cancellationToken)

{

return Task.FromResult(Execute<TResult>(expression));

}

internal class TestDbAsyncEnumerable<T> : EnumerableQuery<T>, IDbAsyncEnumerable<T>, IQueryable<T>

{

public TestDbAsyncEnumerable(IEnumerable<T> enumerable)

: base(enumerable)

{ }

public TestDbAsyncEnumerable(Expression expression)

: base(expression)

{ }

public IDbAsyncEnumerator<T> GetAsyncEnumerator()

{

return new TestDbAsyncEnumerator<T>(this.AsEnumerable().GetEnumerator());

}

IDbAsyncEnumerator IDbAsyncEnumerable.GetAsyncEnumerator()

{

return GetAsyncEnumerator();

}

IQueryProvider IQueryable.Provider

{

get { return new TestDbAsyncQueryProvider<T>(this); }

}

internal class TestDbAsyncEnumerator<T> : IDbAsyncEnumerator<T>

{

private readonly IEnumerator<T> _inner;

public TestDbAsyncEnumerator(IEnumerator<T> inner)

{

_inner = inner;

}

public void Dispose()

{

_inner.Dispose();

}

public Task<bool> MoveNextAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)

{

return Task.FromResult(_inner.MoveNext());

}

public T Current

{

get { return _inner.Current; }

}

object IDbAsyncEnumerator.Current

{

get { return Current; }

}

I found a possible solution in the Moq framework but I can't really translate to Just Mock. The idea is that you would place the following block of code in the set creation function:

mockSet.Setup(t => t.FindAsync(It.IsAny<int>())).Returns(Task.FromResult(chks));

I've only been using Just Mock for a few days now, so it might just a be a fundamental issue that I'm missing.

General Discussions

answered on 12 Jun 2014

12 answers

278 views

JustMock integration with Visual Studio 2012 Ultimate Update 1

Has there been any reported instability with JustMock installed with Visual Studio 2012 Ultimate Update 1 on WIndows 7 x64? I have installed the evaluation version of JustMock on two separate installations of VS 2012 and continuously get IntelliTrace.exe errors, causing Visual Studio to lock up and become unusable.

Please advise of any workarounds.

General Discussions

answered on 09 Jun 2014

1 answer

138 views

Mocking WinRT Types

I'm currently evaluating JustMock for a Windows Store App that I'm developing.

I've tried this code:

var mock = Mock.Create<ConnectionProfile>(Constructor.NotMocked);

Assert.AreEqual(NetworkConnectivityLevel.ConstrainedInternetAccess, mock.GetNetworkConnectivityLevel());

And it fails with the following exception:

Result Message: Test method JustMockWinRtTypes.UnitTest1.MockTest threw exception:
Telerik.JustMock.MockException: Failed to create instance of type 'Windows.Networking.Connectivity.ConnectionProfile'
Result StackTrace:
at Telerik.JustMock.Core.MocksRepository.CreateExternalMockMixin(Type mockObjectType, Object mockObject, IEnumerable`1 mixins, IEnumerable`1 supplementaryBehaviors, IEnumerable`1 fallbackBehaviors)
at Telerik.JustMock.Core.MocksRepository.Create(Type type, MockCreationSettings settings)
at Telerik.JustMock.MockBuilder.Create(MocksRepository repository, Type type, Object[] constructorArgs, Nullable`1 behavior, Type[] additionalMockedInterfaces, Nullable`1 mockConstructorCall, IEnumerable`1 additionalProxyTypeAttributes, List`1 supplementaryBehaviors, List`1 fallbackBehaviors, List`1 mixins, Expression`1 interceptorFilter)
at Telerik.JustMock.Mock.<>c__DisplayClass81`1.<Create>b__80()
at Telerik.JustMock.Core.ProfilerInterceptor.GuardInternal[T](Func`1 guardedAction)
at Telerik.JustMock.Mock.Create[T](Constructor constructor)
at JustMockWinRtTypes.UnitTest1.MockTest() in c:\Source Code\Spikes\JustMockWinRtTypes\JustMockWinRtTypes\UnitTest1.cs:line 22

Can you tell me what I need to do to make this work?

Thanks

Simon

General Discussions

answered on 29 May 2014

1 answer

73 views

Let test fail if an external (not mocked) method is called

Is it possible to let tests fail or throw an exception if a test calls a method that is not mocked?
exmaple:
method A calls method B and C
B is mocked and C is not mocked, but produces a valid result -> the test is ok, but it is not a valid unit-test.
I need a way to force the developer to write valid unit-tests. That means: as soon as a method calls an "unmocked" method the test should fail or generate an exception.
Is there an easy way to do this?

thx

General Discussions

answered on 23 May 2014

7 answers

204 views

How to mock events when using Future Mocking?

Hello,

I need to test the handler of a Timer in one class. We are using Future Mocking to mock the Timer inside it.

Is there a way to use the Raise together with the .IgnoreInstance() method? I haven't found it.

Regards.

General Discussions

answered on 07 May 2014

1 answer

906 views

How to mock ObjectResult<T> generated from Entity Framework 6

Given:

MyDbContext.GetProjects() which is generated via EntityFramework 6 from a stored procedure.

The return type is ObjectResult<MyProject>

I want to mock the results with a specific collection of Data.

Mock.Arrange(() => MyDbContextMock.GetProjects()).Returns(FakeEmptyList());

trying to use the following:

public ObjectResult<MyProject> FakeEmptyList()

{

return new ObjectResult<MyProject>();

}

results in:

Error 18 The type 'System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectResult<T>' has no constructors defined ............

I am new to JustMock and appreciate the help. Thanks!

General Discussions

answered on 30 Apr 2014

3 answers

179 views

private static mock returning null

Hi there,
Been trying out the JustMock pro trial and I'm almost ready to buy. However, I have run into an issue which could be a deal breaker. Hoping someone with more knowledge of the product can steer me in the right direction.

I am attempting to test a private static method that resides in the codebehind file of a default.aspx page of a single-page web application (aka default.aspx.cs). The method under test is a very simple one that is a component of a much larger processes involving URL's, see below:

default.aspx.cs

namespace Company.Project
{
public partial class _default : System.Web.UI.Page
{
private static string CleanupURL(String theUrl)
{
theUrl = theUrl.ToLower();
theUrl = theUrl.Replace(@"\", "/");
while (!theUrl.IndexOf(".aspx").Equals(-1))
{
theUrl = theUrl.Substring(0, theUrl.IndexOf(".aspx"));
while (!theUrl.EndsWith("/") && theUrl.Length > 0)
{
theUrl = theUrl.Substring(0, theUrl.Length - 1);
}
}
return theUrl;
}
}
}

here is the test I have written (using nunit/justmock/dotcover test runner)

[Test]
public void WillCleanupUrl()
{
var instance = PrivateAccessor.ForType(typeof(_default));
string given = "server/subsite/default.aspx";
var expected = "server/subsite";
var returned = instance.CallMethod("CleanpUrl", given);
Assert.AreEqual(expected, returned);
}

My implementation is a copy/pasta of the example shown in the documentation regarding static methods with private accessors however the returned var is always null.

Other information:
This test is being executed inside of a virtual machine that has IIS/SQL/Sharepoint installed on it and it also communicates with a neighboring domain controller vm. Essentially, everything the project needs to run the entire application is running locally or nearby on the virtual lan, there is no true connection to the internet. I notice, using fiddler2, that requests are being sent to various URL's (monitor.ashx?) by the jetbrains dotcover test runner. Obviously, these requests fail. Not sure if this has something to do with it? Possible bug?

Any help or guidance on the issue would be greatly appreciated!

General Discussions

answered on 23 Apr 2014

7 answers

358 views

After installing JustMock, I get Token 0x02000001 metadataToken

After installing JustMock I get the following message:

Token 0x02000001 resolves to the special module type representing this module. Parameter name: metadataToken

after I have started a Web Project (this message is shown in Internet Explorer).

I have reinstalled my machine, but it still happens.

Cheers Harry

PS More Information shown in Internet Explorer:

Server Error in '/' Application.

Token 0x02000001 resolves to the special module type representing this module.
Parameter name: metadataToken

Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.ArgumentException: Token 0x02000001 resolves to the special module type representing this module.
Parameter name: metadataToken

Source Error:

 An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.

Stack Trace:


            [ArgumentException: Token 0x02000001 resolves to the special module type representing this module. Parameter name: metadataToken] System.Reflection.RuntimeModule.ResolveType(Int32 metadataToken, Type[] genericTypeArguments, Type[] genericMethodArguments) +820 System.Reflection.CustomAttribute.FilterCustomAttributeRecord(CustomAttributeRecord caRecord, MetadataImport scope, Assembly& lastAptcaOkAssembly, RuntimeModule decoratedModule, MetadataToken decoratedToken, RuntimeType attributeFilterType, Boolean mustBeInheritable, Object[] attributes, IList derivedAttributes, RuntimeType& attributeType, IRuntimeMethodInfo& ctor, Boolean& ctorHasParameters, Boolean& isVarArg) +878 System.Reflection.CustomAttribute.GetCustomAttributes(RuntimeModule decoratedModule, Int32 decoratedMetadataToken, Int32 pcaCount, RuntimeType attributeFilterType, Boolean mustBeInheritable, IList derivedAttributes, Boolean isDecoratedTargetSecurityTransparent) +917 System.Reflection.CustomAttribute.GetCustomAttributes(RuntimeModule decoratedModule, Int32 decoratedMetadataToken, Int32 pcaCount, RuntimeType attributeFilterType, Boolean isDecoratedTargetSecurityTransparent) +364 System.Reflection.CustomAttribute.GetCustomAttributes(RuntimeAssembly assembly, RuntimeType caType) +345 System.Reflection.RuntimeAssembly.GetCustomAttributes(Type attributeType, Boolean inherit) +339 WebActivator.AssemblyExtensions.GetActivationAttributes(Assembly assembly) +388 WebActivator.ActivationManager.RunActivationMethods() +411 WebActivator.ActivationManager.RunPreStartMethods() +224 WebActivator.ActivationManager.Run() +243 [InvalidOperationException: The pre-application start initialization method Run on type WebActivator.ActivationManager threw an exception with the following error message: Token 0x02000001 resolves to the special module type representing this module. Parameter name: metadataToken.] System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.InvokePreStartInitMethodsCore(ICollection`1 methods, Func`1 setHostingEnvironmentCultures) +748 System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.InvokePreStartInitMethods(ICollection`1 methods) +290 System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.CallPreStartInitMethods(String preStartInitListPath) +309 System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.ExecutePreAppStart() +288 System.Web.Hosting.HostingEnvironment.Initialize(ApplicationManager appManager, IApplicationHost appHost, IConfigMapPathFactory configMapPathFactory, HostingEnvironmentParameters hostingParameters, PolicyLevel policyLevel, Exception appDomainCreationException) +895 [HttpException (0x80004005): The pre-application start initialization method Run on type WebActivator.ActivationManager threw an exception with the following error message: Token 0x02000001 resolves to the special module type representing this module. Parameter name: metadataToken.] System.Web.HttpRuntime.FirstRequestInit(HttpContext context) +725 System.Web.HttpRuntime.EnsureFirstRequestInit(HttpContext context) +283 System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest wr, HttpContext context) +420

Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.0.30319.18045

General Discussions

answered on 10 Apr 2014

1 answer

115 views

Not able to Mock Objects

Even after installing JustMock Software, I'm not able to mock the objects.

A piece of code works on other machine but the same doesn't works on mine.

To Mock a object I wrote:

Class obj = Mock.Create<Class>(Constructor.Mocked);

But when I try to execute this statement, ideally the debugger should not go inside the constructor but unfortunately it does.

Any suggestion would be of great help.

General Discussions

answered on 10 Apr 2014