Is it possible to let tests fail or throw an exception if a test calls a method that is not mocked?
exmaple:
method A calls method B and C
B is mocked and C is not mocked, but produces a valid result -> the test is ok, but it is not a valid unit-test.
I need a way to force the developer to write valid unit-tests. That means: as soon as a method calls an "unmocked" method the test should fail or generate an exception.
Is there an easy way to do this?
thx
exmaple:
method A calls method B and C
B is mocked and C is not mocked, but produces a valid result -> the test is ok, but it is not a valid unit-test.
I need a way to force the developer to write valid unit-tests. That means: as soon as a method calls an "unmocked" method the test should fail or generate an exception.
Is there an easy way to do this?
thx
1 Answer, 1 is accepted
0
Hello ,
This is completely achievable by applying a strict behavior to your mocks. With it, the execution of any un-arranged method from that mock, will throw an exception. More details about this can be found here. You can also check the samples in our JustMock example projects.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Kaloyan
Telerik
This is completely achievable by applying a strict behavior to your mocks. With it, the execution of any un-arranged method from that mock, will throw an exception. More details about this can be found here. You can also check the samples in our JustMock example projects.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Kaloyan
Telerik
Check out the Telerik Platform - the only platform that combines a rich set of UI tools with powerful cloud services to develop web, hybrid and native mobile apps.