Hi,

Looking at getting JustMock but have a simple license question. If say in a dev team of 20, only 10 would write unit tests, but the unit tests are in the solution, would the remaining 10 developers that don't have a JustMock license be able to build and run the unit tests?

Thanks for your help

Graham

I'm using Visual Studio 2013 MSTest
JustMock Lite 2014.2.609.3 (via NuGet)

I'm trying to move the "MustBeCalled" expectations to TestCleanup.
Here is an example of code.


If I run the code as is, the test will pass (regardless if line 20 is commented or not).

This can be fixed by moving the Mock.Assert to line 22+ but ideally I would like to "auto call" Mock.Assert at the end of every test.  I thought that adding it to TestCleanup would work but it doesn't appear to do so.

It appears that prior to TestCleanup running, JustMock will clear out the expectations prior to running TestCleanup.
Is there anyway around this?

Why am I doing this?
Because I'd actually like to write tests like this.


Of course my actual test classes will be more complex. But this approach allows me to Mock out MustBeCalled expectations in a more readable manner.  Currently, the test author will have to remember to call Assert the _svc class (or _assertList) at the end of every TestMethod, but was hoping for a more maintainable solution.

Thanks

If this has been answered already you can just direct me there...

In the method i am working on I am trying to mock a "checkpoint".

the line of code is this....    if (File.Exists(filePath)){
rest of code is here
}
I need to mock this so the program just moves on regardless of if there is a file there or not.

Any suggestions?

In some of my unit tests I run the "unhappy path" to show a failure result as another test. My question is when using a fluent Assert such as:

        [TestMethod]
        public void U05WILLFAILShouldOccursNever()
        {
            var alpha = Mock.Create<IStingPatrol>();

            alpha.Submit();

            Mock.Assert(() => alpha.Submit(), Occurs.Never());
            
        }

how do I pass this failure? I know it will fail, that is the purpose of this. but how do I make it so it does not come up as a failure when I run my tests? 

Using VS 2012 update 4 w/ the latest version of JustMock (verified in the Telerik Control Panel).

I have the following lines in my test:

            jobLogEntries = new List<job_log>();
            jobLogEntries.Add(new job_log
            {
                job_log_ky = 27,
            });
            Mock.Arrange(() => this.Entities.job_log).IgnoreInstance().ReturnsCollection(jobLogEntries);

I have the following lines inside the code being tested:
                jobLog = new job_log
                {
                    job_schedule_ky = this.JobScheduleRecord.job_schedule_ky,
                    job_name = this.JobScheduleRecord.job_name,
                    start_dt_tm = DateTime.Now,
                };
                ctx.job_log.Add(jobLog);

During debugging I can see the job_log record that was added into the collection by the test, however the jobLog entity is not being added to the collection, causing the overall test to fail.

When I try to use a mock to mock a nonpublic I get a ElevatedMockingException. I believe it is because I do not have the elevated mode on, How do I do that?

Hi Everyone,

From this link http://www.telerik.com/help/justmock/advanced-usage-private-accessor.html I understood that we can call private methods and properties but by using JustMock. Can I give some value to private variable in class
Example:
Class JustMock
{
       private string name="Testing"
       Private string ReturnSomeValue()
        {
            return name;
         }

}

Here my question is can I assign my own value to name variable with JustMock

Regards,
Rajendar.

Hello,

when a test with a nonPublic mock fails, following gets written to the stacktrace of the .trx file:



the &#x characters let the build fail, because they cannot be transformed.

see:

already created an issue for the plugin author (https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-23531)


Is there a way to prevent this errors or to change the encoding of justmocks exception messages?

kind regards
peter

I am stuck to mock Entity Framework 6 asynchronous methods using JustMock. I searched in Google a lot but did not get any sufficient result. At last I got an example a testing with async queries but it is used Moq.

I am try to convert this into JustMock but i can not find anything like .As<TInterface>() in JustMock. Please tell me what is equivalent of moq.As in JustMock ?

I already spend more than 1 week for it. Please response as soon as possible.
Thanks.