This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.

CSS change from Q2 2009 to Q2 2010

2 Answers 12 Views
Menu
This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.
Clive Hoggar
Top achievements
Rank 1
Clive Hoggar asked on 01 Sep 2010, 07:45 PM

Hi guys

I seem to have a problem afetr upgrading to Q2 2010 version of the controls.
I have a menu created using Q2 2009 version and have modified the text colors of the Bllack skin
with this css:

div.RadMenu_Black .rmRootGroup .rmLink {       
        color:#A49261;     
        font-family: Georgia; 
        font-weight:500; 
        font-size:11px;   
    }  
div.RadMenu_Black .rmRootGroup .rmLink:hover, 
div.RadMenu_Black .rmRootGroup .rmLink:focused 
 
        color:#A49261;     
        font-family: Georgia;     
}

The problem is that the hover color is no longer modified and has reverted to green.  How do I fix this in the new version?

Thanks

Clive

2 Answers, 1 is accepted

Sort by
0
Kamen Bundev
Telerik team
answered on 02 Sep 2010, 09:11 AM
Hello Clive,

Yes, there was a change in RadMenu to improve perfomance in IE7 with its problematic handling of :hover pseudo classes. Change the CSS like this and it should work:
div.RadMenu_Black .rmRootGroup a.rmLink
{
        color:#A49261;
        font-family: Georgia;
        font-weight:500;
        font-size:11px;
}

div.RadMenu_Black .rmRootGroup a.rmLink:hover, 
div.RadMenu_Black .rmRootGroup a.rmFocused
{
        color:#A49261;     
        font-family: Georgia;     
}

Regards,
Kamen Bundev
the Telerik team
Do you want to have your say when we set our development plans? Do you want to know when a feature you care about is added or when a bug fixed? Explore the Telerik Public Issue Tracking system and vote to affect the priority of the items
0
Clive Hoggar
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 02 Sep 2010, 09:54 AM
Thanks Kamen
That does it!
Clive
Tags
Menu
Asked by
Clive Hoggar
Top achievements
Rank 1
Answers by
Kamen Bundev
Telerik team
Clive Hoggar
Top achievements
Rank 1
Share this question
or