Web
As I said in my previous post I preferred using tools (StoryQ and NetSpec) to using descriptive method names (those with long names containing lots of underscores). Well, I lied. At first I was convinced that the tools would be good enough for me but as it usually occurs the truth lies somewhere in between.
Here's what I have in mind. Let's take as an example the famous sample showing how you could apply BDD when you want to develop the logic for transferring money from a savings account to a cash account. If you use StoryQ you could end up having something like this: [TestMethod] public void TransferToCashAccount() { ...