This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.

Serialization problem (restoring wrong sizes)

6 Answers 80 Views
Dock
This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.
OBollmann
Top achievements
Rank 2
Iron
OBollmann asked on 21 Jun 2008, 02:31 PM
Hi there,

I have got problems regarding serialization/deserialization of docking layouts.

1.) When I adjust the width or height of an auto hidden window, this size won't be stored anyhow. If I reload the layout the size is alwas set to a default size. So the user have no chance to adjust the width or height of auto hidden windows permanently. I can reproduce this behaviour with the RadControls for WinForms example application under "RadDock-->Serialization". For me it seems that the size of an autohidden window isn't stored in the xml file at all. Am correct there? What can I do?

2.) When having a floating window the size of this window will not be restored correctly. Its size decreases everytime saving and loading the layout to xml. This behaviour can be reproduced in the sample application, too!

Please help ...


Best regards,
Oliver Bollmann

6 Answers, 1 is accepted

Sort by
0
Julian Benkov
Telerik team
answered on 23 Jun 2008, 11:28 AM
Hi Oliver,

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Currently, we cannot provide you with a reliable solution for this behavior. We will address this behavior and will introduce a simpler API for our future releases.

Thank you for the reported issues. Your Telerik points have been updated.

Sincerely yours,
Julian Benkov
the Telerik team

Instantly find answers to your questions at the new Telerik Support Center
0
Ryan
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 05 Mar 2009, 09:54 PM
What is the status of this issue?  Has it been resolved?
0
Julian Benkov
Telerik team
answered on 07 Mar 2009, 10:00 AM
Hi Ryan,

Sorry for the introduced inconvenience.

Currently we implement a new edition of RadDock control with new dock engine and new simple API to control states of Dock windows. With new RadDock you can control all AutoHide, Floating, Dock states (Size, Location, AutoHide Pos, etc.)  and this changes will be saved/restored correctly.

The new edition of RadDock will be delay for Q2 2009, however soon after Q1 2009 we will introduce Beta version. Do not hesitate to write me back if you have further questions.

Greetings,
Julian Benkov
the Telerik team

Instantly find answers to your questions on the new Telerik Support Portal.
Check out the tips for optimizing your support resource searches.
0
Craig Finnigan
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 02 Jun 2009, 08:51 PM
How can we sign up for the Beta version of this?
0
Nick
Telerik team
answered on 03 Jun 2009, 08:42 AM
Hello Craig Finnigan,

I have added you to the list of RadDock beta testers. The beta is currently expected to be released at the end of the week.

Sincerely yours,
Nick
the Telerik team

Instantly find answers to your questions on the new Telerik Support Portal.
Check out the tips for optimizing your support resource searches.
0
Vassil Petev
Telerik team
answered on 09 Jun 2009, 05:47 PM
Hi guys,

It is our pleasure to present you the much improved and completely new RadDock for WinForms (Q2 2009 Beta). You can find detailed information on what is new and improved here: RadDock for WinForms Q2 2009 Beta.Project upgrading instructions are also included.

The beta is available for download from your Telerik accounts --> Downloads (or Free Trials for the trial version) --> RadControls for WinForms:

RadControls for WinForms Beta Download


We are eager to get your feedback on the RadDock beta, so please use the WinForms Beta Forum to send us your comments.

Enjoy!
 


All the best,
Vassil
the Telerik team

Instantly find answers to your questions on the new Telerik Support Portal.
Check out the tips for optimizing your support resource searches.
Tags
Dock
Asked by
OBollmann
Top achievements
Rank 2
Iron
Answers by
Julian Benkov
Telerik team
Ryan
Top achievements
Rank 1
Craig Finnigan
Top achievements
Rank 1
Nick
Telerik team
Vassil Petev
Telerik team
Share this question
or