RadDocking.DocumentHost, Caliburn.Micro and ContentControl

[Will]

Greetings,

I have a project using Telerik and Caliburn.Micro.  Up to this point everything has been smooth, clean, light and flawless.  However, I've hit a roadblock and now need serious help.  I need to use custom controls within the DocumentHost portion of the RadDocking framework.  Below is XAML declarations that identifies a declaration that does work, and one that does not work using the same control.

Does NOT work:

<telerik:RadDocking.DocumentHost>
    <telerik:RadSplitContainer>
        <telerik:RadPaneGroup>
            <telerik:RadDocumentPane Title="Document" x:Name="uxRadDocumentPane">
                <telerik:RadDocumentPane.Content>
                    <StackPanel Background="Bisque">
                        <ContentControl x:Name="ImageControlImageViewModel"/>
                    </StackPanel>
                </telerik:RadDocumentPane.Content>
            </telerik:RadDocumentPane>
        </telerik:RadPaneGroup>
    </telerik:RadSplitContainer>
</telerik:RadDocking.DocumentHost>

Does work:

<telerik:RadSplitContainer>
    <telerik:RadPaneGroup>
        <telerik:RadDocumentPane Title="Document">
            <telerik:RadDocumentPane.Content>
                <StackPanel Background="Bisque">
                    <ContentControl x:Name="ImageControlImageViewModel2"/>
                </StackPanel>
            </telerik:RadDocumentPane.Content>
        </telerik:RadDocumentPane>
    </telerik:RadPaneGroup>
</telerik:RadSplitContainer>

As you can see, the declarations are nearly identical.  The user control is identical, only has a different reference name.  This work only when I remove the DocumentHost container.  How can I get this to work and still keep the implementation lean, mean and clean?

Thank you,

Will

[Kalin]

Hi,

We noticed that you posted another post with ID: 696835 about this issue and we responded to you in the other post. Could we continue the discussion there?

I'll post our response from the other thread in post too so it is available for the community:

We tried to reproduce the issue but to no avail. We tested both scenarios and they are working correctly.

Regards,
Kalin
Telerik

[Ihab]

Can you at least post a link to the other thread? how I am meant to find ID: 696835 

[Kalin]

Hi Ihab,

The ID was for private support ticket. However we were unable to reproduce the described issue in this thread. If you have faced a similar issue, I'll ask you to open new support ticket and attach a sample project there, so we can further investigate it on our side.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Kalin
Telerik