Currently, FireFox doesn't support using "em" units in the "width" attribute of COL elements. This presents a problem because the HeaderStyle.Width property renders in FireFox like so:
However, em units ARE supported in FireFox if the widths are set using the "style" attribute:
Interestingly, width attributes are rendered in IE without the "em":
| <colgroup> |
| <col width="25em"/> |
| <col width="5em"/> |
| <col width="5em"/> |
| </colgroup> |
However, em units ARE supported in FireFox if the widths are set using the "style" attribute:
| <colgroup> |
| <col style="width:25em"/> |
| <col style="width:5em"/> |
| <col style="width:5em"/> |
| </colgroup> |
Interestingly, width attributes are rendered in IE without the "em":
| <colgroup> |
| <col width="25"/> |
| <col width="5"/> |
| <col width="5"/> |
| </colgroup> |
1 Answer, 1 is accepted
0
Hi Brett,
Thank you for your feedback. We will investigate further on this matter and consider improving the RadGrid behavior and column width support in the future.
In the meantime, you can use column widths in percent or pixels.
Best wishes,
Dimo
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions on the new Telerik Support Portal.
Check out the tips for optimizing your support resource searches.
Thank you for your feedback. We will investigate further on this matter and consider improving the RadGrid behavior and column width support in the future.
In the meantime, you can use column widths in percent or pixels.
Best wishes,
Dimo
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions on the new Telerik Support Portal.
Check out the tips for optimizing your support resource searches.