Can't get Editor Content in Wizard Control

[Chase Florell]

Ok, so this seems like a pretty normal operation, but my label is not getting populated with the RadEditor.Content .. why would this be?

I am using a wizard control and in the second to last WizardStep (Step5) I have 6 small RadEditors.

Then I run the following

Protected Sub WizardStep6_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles WizardStep6.Load

        'Descriptions from Editor

        lblDetails69.Text = txtBusinessDescription.Content
        lblDetails70.Text = txtMarketDescription.Content
        lblDetails71.Text = txtFinancialDescription.Content
        lblDetails72.Text = txtIncluded.Content
        lblDetails73.Text = txtReasonForSale.Content
        lblDetails74.Text = txtOtherInfo.Content

    End Sub

But the details labels do not get populated with any content... does anyone have an answer?

[George]

Hi Chase,

I tested the scenario locally and everything worked fine on my side - please find attached a sample video that demonstrates my test. Could you please open a support ticket and send us a sample runnable project where the problem can be observed? We will examine it locally and do our best to provide a solution.


Best wishes,
George
the Telerik team

Check out Telerik Trainer, the state of the art learning tool for Telerik products.

[Chase Florell]

Though I am still struggling with this, it turns out it has nothing to do with Telerik.  My Wizard is inside a UserControl that is dynamically loaded into an aspx page.

If I add an additional step to the Wizard, or go "previous/next" on the last page, the information is there.  It has something to do with the dynamic usercontrol not passing the information on the first postback but working on the second postback.

I could hardcode the UserControl into the ASPX page (which works fine), however that would defeat the purpose of using the UserControl in the first place.



PS: the Test Video's as EXE's totally sucks... is there no way you can just upload the AVI's in the future?  Thanks.