This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.

Tabbed child view - rows instead of tabs

3 Answers 106 Views
GridView
This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.
Michal
Top achievements
Rank 1
Michal asked on 01 Jun 2010, 02:46 PM

Hi,

I would like to replace tabs (Parameters, Patterns) to expandable nodes, so it should look like that:

- |

  + Parameters

         Name       Value    Service

      -     ...            .....       ...... 

      -     ...            .....       ...... 

  + Patterns

         Definition  Value

      -     ...            .....

      -     ...            .....    

Can someone please give me some tips to do it?

Regards,

Michal

3 Answers, 1 is accepted

Sort by
0
Michal
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 02 Jun 2010, 07:05 AM

Hi,

 It's a pity, but I get my answer here :(

http://www.telerik.com/community/forums/winforms/gridview/no-tabbed-child-views.aspx

Regards,

Michal

0
Michal
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 02 Jun 2010, 01:54 PM

What's more there is no possibility to customize it i.e. put another grid inside ...

http://www.telerik.com/community/forums/winforms/gridview/nesting-a-gridview-within-a-gridview.aspx

Any clues ?

0
Jack
Telerik team
answered on 07 Jun 2010, 08:41 AM
Hi Michal,

Such layout can't be achieved with RadGridView at this point. However, as stated in our previous responses, we think that this is an interesting feature and we will consider it when planning our future versions. We will be grateful if you describe your scenario in greater detail, because this will help us to shape our RadGridView better.

 

All the best,
Jack
the Telerik team

Do you want to have your say when we set our development plans? Do you want to know when a feature you care about is added or when a bug fixed? Explore the Telerik Public Issue Tracking system and vote to affect the priority of the items.
Tags
GridView
Asked by
Michal
Top achievements
Rank 1
Answers by
Michal
Top achievements
Rank 1
Jack
Telerik team
Share this question
or