Hello,
I've noticed a bug with the the grid scroll when working with the virtualization of remote data.
When I try to scoll until the last row of the grid, sometime the last rows won't be displayed. Sometimes, I'll be able to see only the top part of the last row, sometime 1 to 5 rows won't be displayed at all and sometime, everything will be displayed correctly.
I did check on the server to make sure that all the data was returned and I looked carefully at my code to make sure there was no bug on the client side. Then I tried your virtualization of remote data demo and to problem occurs in your demo too.
To reproduce the bug on the Demo, sort the grid by OrderID in DESC order (For some reason, the bug won't occur in the ASC order)
Then take your mouse and scroll all the way down to the last row. The last OrderID is suppose to be 10248 and 50% of the time, it is. Then start to scroll up and down mutiple time and then go see the last row's OrderID. Do this 10+ times and you'll see a couple of different results.
Best regards,
Simon
I've noticed a bug with the the grid scroll when working with the virtualization of remote data.
When I try to scoll until the last row of the grid, sometime the last rows won't be displayed. Sometimes, I'll be able to see only the top part of the last row, sometime 1 to 5 rows won't be displayed at all and sometime, everything will be displayed correctly.
I did check on the server to make sure that all the data was returned and I looked carefully at my code to make sure there was no bug on the client side. Then I tried your virtualization of remote data demo and to problem occurs in your demo too.
To reproduce the bug on the Demo, sort the grid by OrderID in DESC order (For some reason, the bug won't occur in the ASC order)
Then take your mouse and scroll all the way down to the last row. The last OrderID is suppose to be 10248 and 50% of the time, it is. Then start to scroll up and down mutiple time and then go see the last row's OrderID. Do this 10+ times and you'll see a couple of different results.
Best regards,
Simon