This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.

RadGrid - property builder throws exception!!!!

3 Answers 69 Views
GridView
This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.
revital
Top achievements
Rank 1
revital asked on 15 Apr 2008, 03:32 PM
Hi ,
I am trying to configure a RadGrid in my asp.net project, and anytime I try opening the property builder I get an TargetInvocationException (NullReferenceException).
This is very wierd  - especially because in the beginning of the project I was able to do so - it just suddenly started happening.
Also - I have no exceptions at runtime , and I am able to display my data in the grid...

please help , I really need to get into the added options found only in this property builder.

thanx in advance,
rk

3 Answers, 1 is accepted

Sort by
0
Prangadj
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 16 Apr 2008, 06:46 AM
I had this problem with old version of RadGrid but newer version does not have this problem (I have 5.1.2 on my side). Try it out as it works under VS 2005 and 2008.

Prangadj
0
revital
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 16 Apr 2008, 07:17 AM
I am using the same version as you (5.1.2) - it's the only version I used

I will be happy to get more inputs from anyone that has encoutered this problem in version 5.1.2.

Currently I am starting a new project and the property builder seems to work (for now...).

rk
0
Steve
Telerik team
answered on 16 Apr 2008, 12:07 PM
Hello revital,

We had no reports of such a problem with the latest version of the control (in fact no such reports since v.4.6.x). Is there anything specific in your project or a step that causes the problem? Are you using Visual Web Developer by any chance? Any additional information would be highly appreciated.

Greetings,
Steve
the Telerik team

Instantly find answers to your questions at the new Telerik Support Center
Tags
GridView
Asked by
revital
Top achievements
Rank 1
Answers by
Prangadj
Top achievements
Rank 1
revital
Top achievements
Rank 1
Steve
Telerik team
Share this question
or