In the online doc topic on "Lightweight Templates" here:
http://www.telerik.com/help/wpf/gridview-overview-lightweight-template.html
There is a note that states:
"Please set the RowIndicatorVisibility property of the RadGridView to Collapsed to avoid any visual differences between the row's headers and cells."
It's unclear to me what this has to do with the Lightweight templates and why it's necessary to Collapse the RowIndicator? Also, I notice that in the last screenshot shown in the above-linked topic, the RowIndicator is clearly visible (so, not collapsed)...
In my case, I'd like to use the lightweight templates (with validation) for performance, but I need the RowIndicator column to be visible in order to select entire rows for various editing functions. I've activated the lightweight templates, but have not collapsed the row indicator as suggested. I don't see any issues with this combination, but wondered what I might be missing?
Thanks for any clarification on this topic.
Jeff
http://www.telerik.com/help/wpf/gridview-overview-lightweight-template.html
There is a note that states:
"Please set the RowIndicatorVisibility property of the RadGridView to Collapsed to avoid any visual differences between the row's headers and cells."
It's unclear to me what this has to do with the Lightweight templates and why it's necessary to Collapse the RowIndicator? Also, I notice that in the last screenshot shown in the above-linked topic, the RowIndicator is clearly visible (so, not collapsed)...
In my case, I'd like to use the lightweight templates (with validation) for performance, but I need the RowIndicator column to be visible in order to select entire rows for various editing functions. I've activated the lightweight templates, but have not collapsed the row indicator as suggested. I don't see any issues with this combination, but wondered what I might be missing?
Thanks for any clarification on this topic.
Jeff