[Solved] Kendo UI sync() not firing when datasource._destroyed is populated (dirty)

[Stan]

Here is slimmed down version of code:

gridDataSource = new kendo.data.DataSource({
        batch: true,
        transport: {
            read: {
                url: 'Equipment'
            },
            destroy: {
                url: 'Equipment',
                contentType: "application/json",
                dataType: 'json',
                type: "DELETE"
            },
            parameterMap: function (options, operation) {
                if (operation == "read") {
                    return "this=works-fine";
                } else {
                    alert('not reading');
                    return kendo.stringify(options.models);
                }
            }
        },
        schema: {
            id: "EquipmentId",
            fields: {
                EquipmentId: { type: "number" }
            }
        }
    });

kendoGrid = gridObj.kendoGrid({
        dataSource: gridDataSource,
        selectable: 'row',
        navigatable: true,
        change: rowSelect,
        sortable: true,
        pageable: false,
        editable: { confirmation: false },
        columns: [
            { field: "EquipmentId" },
        ]
    }).data('kendoGrid');

And the read works just fine, I remove a row (or many) with this (selectedRow is populated correctly, just skipped for brevity):

$('#footer-remove').off().on('click', function () {
        kendoGrid.removeRow('table tr[data-uid="' + selectedRow.uid + '"]');
        console.log(gridDataSource._destroyed);
    });

And its shows up in gridDataSource._destroyed, all my tests all show that the gridDataSource is dirty.When I call sync, nothing happens if I am just deleting. What am I missing? Thank you.

[Petur Subev]

Hello Stan,

Could you please demonstrate your case with a small demo? Here is an example that shows that when several rows are removed the sync methods sends a request to the server.

http://dojo.telerik.com/@pesho/IMafI

Feel free to modify my example to demonstrate your case if I missed something.

Regards,
Petur Subev
Telerik

 

 

[Stan]

turns out my schema did not include 'model'