Getting used to the impressive speed and ease at which we can create a brilliant interface with the telerik winforms controls , I find myself wondering about WPF.
WPF is awesome in terms of flexibility and customisation capabilities. It's awesome in terms of performance too. Because of that , all I saw in my mind of the WPF versions of the telerik controls was just winforms x 10.
But we get to the new release of the second beta of the eagerly awaited Q3 release and while the new ribbonbar is as great as expected , it's a far contrast from the winforms one. Suddenly the gap in designer capability differences in what microsoft provides for wpf and winforms becomes exceptionally painful.
Doing a simple ribbonbar is suddenly a ream of code and by no means rad. :/ So all of a sudden when the complexitiy of controls goes up (and let's face it one of the strengths of wpf is in the ability to easily build complex/layered controls) then suddenly it becomes MORE time consuming to create these controls.
So I suppose my point is the concept of xaml is lovely when the complexity of the controls is below a certain level , in fact at that level or below you can create more complex controls than winforms with much less code and time investment. But past a certain point , the code and time investment needed is far greater.
I love the new WPF ribbon bar but creating a ribbon feels really tedious not to mention that once complexity builds on the ribbon , parts of it just don't feel or look intuitive at all. Right now I would dread developing a serious ribbonbar for a serious application and then needing to do even simple changes to it.
Anyone else feel like microsoft are really slacking with wpf designer capability ? Or am I just missing something ?
WPF is awesome in terms of flexibility and customisation capabilities. It's awesome in terms of performance too. Because of that , all I saw in my mind of the WPF versions of the telerik controls was just winforms x 10.
But we get to the new release of the second beta of the eagerly awaited Q3 release and while the new ribbonbar is as great as expected , it's a far contrast from the winforms one. Suddenly the gap in designer capability differences in what microsoft provides for wpf and winforms becomes exceptionally painful.
Doing a simple ribbonbar is suddenly a ream of code and by no means rad. :/ So all of a sudden when the complexitiy of controls goes up (and let's face it one of the strengths of wpf is in the ability to easily build complex/layered controls) then suddenly it becomes MORE time consuming to create these controls.
So I suppose my point is the concept of xaml is lovely when the complexity of the controls is below a certain level , in fact at that level or below you can create more complex controls than winforms with much less code and time investment. But past a certain point , the code and time investment needed is far greater.
I love the new WPF ribbon bar but creating a ribbon feels really tedious not to mention that once complexity builds on the ribbon , parts of it just don't feel or look intuitive at all. Right now I would dread developing a serious ribbonbar for a serious application and then needing to do even simple changes to it.
Anyone else feel like microsoft are really slacking with wpf designer capability ? Or am I just missing something ?