Is there a setting which will allow me to place duplicate entries into a RadTreeView? I am dragging from a GridView into a TreeView, and sometimes I need to allow the user to place the same object more than once. I need to create the following tree:
Bird
--Cardinal
--Cardinal
--BlueJay
--BlueJay
I also see the following issue. When I have this tree:
--Bird
I can drop Cardinal to get:
--Bird
--Cardinal
If I Try to add another Cardinal, I need to "Drop After" Bird, because I can't "Drop Before" or "Drop After" Cardinal, since it has the same object properties, I get the DropImpossible icon everywhere overtop of Cardinal. This is a problem because everyone wants to drop at the end of the list, which is considered over Cardinal.
Finally, if I create a tree with duplicate entries anyway, the tree gets re-ordered, and the selected items act very strangely also.
I will try to create:
--Bird
----Cardinal
----BlueJay
----Cardinal
and when I drag and drop them in that order, it will be re-ordered to:
--Bird
----Cardinal
----Cardinal
----BlueJay
If I select the Child item Cardinal, it might select the other Cardinal item instead.
Thanks for your help,
Scott
Bird
--Cardinal
--Cardinal
--BlueJay
--BlueJay
I also see the following issue. When I have this tree:
--Bird
I can drop Cardinal to get:
--Bird
--Cardinal
If I Try to add another Cardinal, I need to "Drop After" Bird, because I can't "Drop Before" or "Drop After" Cardinal, since it has the same object properties, I get the DropImpossible icon everywhere overtop of Cardinal. This is a problem because everyone wants to drop at the end of the list, which is considered over Cardinal.
Finally, if I create a tree with duplicate entries anyway, the tree gets re-ordered, and the selected items act very strangely also.
I will try to create:
--Bird
----Cardinal
----BlueJay
----Cardinal
and when I drag and drop them in that order, it will be re-ordered to:
--Bird
----Cardinal
----Cardinal
----BlueJay
If I select the Child item Cardinal, it might select the other Cardinal item instead.
Thanks for your help,
Scott