Telerik Rad Controls Integration with GoXam

3 posts, 0 answers
  1. Nick Sullivan
    Nick Sullivan avatar
    2 posts
    Member since:
    Feb 2010

    Posted 24 Aug 2011 Link to this post

    Hi all,
    We've been experiencing some problems with the content residing inside either the Rad Tab or Rad Pane. We believe the issue is possibly related to the "IsContentPreserved" property, as changing this to true in our initial set up, Rad Tabs, seemed to be a fix.
    We've made some changes to the UI, namely hosting the Rad Tabs inside the Docking system, Rad Panes. The problem has reoccurred, although setting the "IsContentPreserved=true" on the Rad PaneGroup hasn't resolved the problem this time. 
    Basically the problem we keep experiencing is that UI elements that're inside either the Rad Tabs or Rad Docking Rad Pane Groups which are bound loose the values or possibly the DataContext all together.

    The DataContext is being set from the constructor in the code behind C#, DataContext not bound from the UI in Xaml.

    Any help with this would be great, thanks in advance

  2. Miroslav Nedyalkov
    Miroslav Nedyalkov avatar
    1718 posts

    Posted 30 Aug 2011 Link to this post

    Hello Nick,

     We are aware of similar problem - the Content of the Panes is not displayed when the IsContentPreserved property of the RadPaneGroup is set to true. We are working on this matter and it should be fixed for the next internal build - next Monday. Please let us know if the problem is not the same.

    Kind regards,
    Miroslav Nedyalkov
    the Telerik team

    Thank you for being the most amazing .NET community! Your unfailing support is what helps us charge forward! We'd appreciate your vote for Telerik in this year's DevProConnections Awards. We are competing in mind-blowing 20 categories and every vote counts! VOTE for Telerik NOW >>

  3. Nick Sullivan
    Nick Sullivan avatar
    2 posts
    Member since:
    Feb 2010

    Posted 26 Sep 2011 Link to this post

    Hi Miroslav,
    I'll look into updating to the build you've mentioned, in the hope it's a better solution, as we ended up finding a work around to this issue.

    Thanks for feedback.
    Nick Sullivan
Back to Top