So I've searched the forums down to page 7 .. sorry if I missed this being answered already.
I have a page in my app that I extended with a tabstrip. So far it it works - displaying what was formerly "there" in one of the tabs, second tab comes later.
My problem comes when dealing with the css surrounding tabstrips.
The tabstrip I first built shows the content that was already there - meaning 2 floated fieldsets containing a grid each. This seems to work "right out of the box" .. but when I look at my page in chrome (current version), I see a nice beautiful frame around the second tab (just a text replacement for the future content, which will also be 2 fieldsets containing a grid each).
Now my first tab shows only a small part of said "beautiful border". The border vanished as soon as I made those fieldsets float right next to each other (float: left; with a definded width). When I inspect the page with firebug or developer console the div created by tabstrip "ends" exactly where the fieldsets start (y-coordinate) hence the border is missing it seems.
Can you give me some hints how I can extend the div to surround the fieldsets (both have exactly the same height..) ?
Hi Sven,
From the provided information I am not sure I understand the issue correctly. Do you need to set the same height and width for all content elements of the TabStrip? If this is the case you use the .k-tabstrip-content class and apply the needed styles. In the Dojo linked here, there is a TabStrip that contains a Grid in each tab. The height of each content is the same using the following style:
<style> .k-tabstrip-content{ height: 300px !important; } </style>
As you will see in the Dojo linked above there are no unexpected borders rendered after switching between the tabs.
If the above does not help resolve the issue could you please elaborate a little bit more on the configuration on your side? I will appreciate it if you could modify the Dojo example to replicate the appearance the way it is on your end and send it back for a review so we could take a closer look.
Looking forward to your reply.
Regards,
Neli