Hi,

I am using KendoUI for javascript angular directive. I have a list of tree object like:

dc.DataSource=[{Name:"Item1",Children:[{Name:"Item1.1"},{Name:"Item1.2"}]},

 {Name:"Item2",Children:[{Name:"Item2.1"},{Name:"Item2.2"}]}

];

What I want to achieve is show each object in datasource in a listview template, and inside the template, I want to use tree view to display the hierarchical data(and a checkbox for each item data). In below code, I just want to know how to set the datasource of the treeview since it is different for each item

<div kendo-list-view k-data-source="dc.DataSource">
        <div k-template>
            <div class="col-md-3">
                <div kendo-tree-view="tree"  k-data-source="{{dataItem}}">
                    <span k-template>
                        {{dataItem.Name}}
                    </span>
                </div>
            </div>
        </div>
    </div>

Thanks,

Ziff

Hi,

i have created scheduler using kendo UI, where start time if 12 Mid night so that i can see 24 hours for that day

there is horizontal scroll bar coming which i dont want.

i would like to have default single page view for 24 hours and if i need i can zoom in to view the detail task

how we can do that

Thanks

Siddhartha

Hi, I think that I found a bug.

I can reproduce it there: 

https://dojo.telerik.com/@foxontherock/EvuWidey

In my app, I need to use "setOptions" sometimes, because I need to change my "columns" collection depending on the data I display.

If I send non-empty data in my setOptions parameter, it looks like they are kept somewhere, they're back later when I try to sort an empty grid.

Steps to reproduct:

1. Initialise with empty data + columns, sortable.
2. Change the dataset, using the kgrid.setOptions(dataSource: {data: [non empty array]})
3. Now, empty the grid with kgrid.dataSource.data([])
4.Click any header to sort the grid.
Surprise!  the original data from step 2 is back!

You can try it easily in my "dojo" sample.

https://dojo.telerik.com/@foxontherock/EvuWidey

For now, what I did is to always use setOptions with empty data, then applying my data after, and it solve my problem. 

But, I take time to mention it to you because I think it's a bug that can happen to someone else.

Thank you

How can I use the tree view with MVVM while at the same time only fetching the nodes that I need.  The sample shows setting up the observableHierarchy and that is it.  Is it even possible?

I know i can set hasChildren to be true on the parent, but how do i then grab the children?

Hello can anyone point me to a Visual Studio example of the following Kendo MVVM example code?

https://demos.telerik.com/kendo-ui/mvvm/source

In other words, i would like to seperate this code into "....htm", "....js" modules and put them into the typcial Visual Studio code diretories like /script and ect.

thanks for any pointers

I'm getting a "too much recursion" error when using a kendo.observable with nested dependent method. I have a nested observable object that needs to get and set values for a field depending on another field's value, so I used the example from the ObservableObject docs, where you have a field bound to a function that gets or sets a value based on whether a parameter is passed in.  This works great when the function is on the top level of the kendo.observable, but when it's nested several levels deep, there's some odd behavior...  Here's a Dojo example:

https://dojo.telerik.com/UpUcaxaP/2

It seems to work when you call the nested dependent function directly in JS or from the console, but as soon as it's bound to the HTML input field with data-bind, it gives the "too much recursion" error.  If you comment out the "this.set('nestedValue', param);" line, then you don't get the recursion error on binding, but when you change the value in the input box you get "TypeError: d.fields is undefined".  I've tried with both the straight use of "this" and also with the "self" one-liner referenced in my other post, and haven't been able to get it to work correctly.  Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?

Thanks!