Questions on JustMock Forum

3 answers

163 views

Tests using Static mocking failing on Build Server

Hi,

We're using TFS2010, and we think we've installed JustMock correctly on the server, but everytime we run the build any test using the Static mocking is failing and everything else passes.

The documentation only seems to deal with the 2008 build scripts, is there a 2010 version anywhere?

Thanks,
John

General Discussions

answered on 24 Sep 2010

1 answer

161 views

Can't mock Unity Container call

Hi,

I'm trying to mock a RegisterType call on a mock Unity Container, but it's not being called. I've recreated the test as follows:

[TestMethod]

public void TestMethod1()

{

IUnityContainer mockContainer = Mock.Create<IUnityContainer>();

Mock.Arrange(() => mockContainer.RegisterType<IConcrete, Concrete>()).Returns(mockContainer);

Class1 consumingClass = new Class1(mockContainer);

consumingClass.RegisterStuffInUnity();

Mock.Assert(() => mockCOntainer.RegisterType<IConcrete, Concrete>(), Occurs.Once());

}

IConcrete and Concrete are empty, obviously Concrete implements IConcrete.

Class1 is very simple as follows:

public class Class1

{

private readonly IUnityContainer _container;

public Class1(IUnityContainer container)

{

_container = container;

}

public void RegisterStuffInUnity()

{

var bob = _container.RegisterType<IConcrete, Concrete>();

}

Any ideas?

Thanks,
John

General Discussions

answered on 22 Sep 2010

1 answer

140 views

Static Mock Help

Hey everyone,

I am trying to do some static mocking. here is my test.

[Test]

public void timesheet_processor_tests_just_mock()

{

Mock.SetupStatic(typeof(LaborManager));

Mock.Arrange(() => LaborManager.GetTimesheetLabor(DateTime.Now, 1683)).Returns(new TimesheetLaborReadOnlyCollection());

var processor = new TimesheetProcessor();

processor.ProcessUserTimesheet(DateTime.Now, 1683);

Mock.Assert(() => LaborManager.GetTimesheetLabor(DateTime.Now, 1683), Occurs.AtLeastOnce());

}

The class TimesheetProcessor uses LaborManager.GetTimesheetLabor() method which I have setup to return a new Collection which by Default would have a count == 0.

However, when I step into this and get into the TimesheetProcessor class where LaborManager.GetTimeSheetLabor() method is called. the variable laborEntries which calls the method I arranged in my test gets set to null instead of a new collection. Please see the timesheet processor code below

//Timesheet Processor Class

public void ProcessUserTimesheet(DateTime weekEndingDate, int userId)

{

TimesheetsCreated = new List<int>();

TimesheetLaborReadOnlyCollection laborEntries = LaborManager.GetTimesheetLabor(weekEndingDate, userId);

if(laborEntries.Count > 0)

ProcessTimesheetLaborUser(userId, weekEndingDate, laborEntries);

}

Why is this happening?
Have I setup my test incorrectly?

I have JustMock enabled.

Thanks,

-zd

General Discussions

answered on 21 Sep 2010

1 answer

292 views

Mock Property Set in VB.Net Module

Does anyone any ideas on how to mock a static property in a Vb.Net module?

I have attempted various solutions, all of which lead to JustMock throwing exceptions.

I am looking for something like:

Mock.ArrangeSet(Sub() VbModule.MyProperty = Arg.AnyString).DoNothing()
 




Any help would be appreciated.

General Discussions

answered on 17 Sep 2010

1 answer

369 views

Mock Registry.GetValue

I am attempting to mock Registry.GetValue with specific parameters using the following code:

Mock.Arrange(Function() Registry.GetValue("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\VB and VBA Program Settings\Legacy App\Options", "SettingValue", String.Empty)).Returns("Test Result")

I get the following exception:

{"Object reference not set to an instance of an object."}
   at ..( parsed, Type argType, Int32 argIndex, Expression argExpression) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\DynamicParser.cs:line 114
   at ..(MethodCallExpression expression) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\DynamicParser.cs:line 94
   at ..(Expression expression) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\ExpressionVisitor.cs:line 61
   at ..() in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\DynamicParser.cs:line 34
   at ..(Object obj, Type mockTarget, MethodInfo method, Expression expression) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\MockContext.cs:line 31
   at ..(Expression`1 expression) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\MockContext.cs:line 23
   at Telerik.JustMock.Mock...( x) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\Mock.cs:line 75
   at ..[TDelgate,TReturn]( instruction, Func2`2 function) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\MockContext.cs:line 226
   at Telerik.JustMock.Mock.Arrange[TResult](Expression`1 expression) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\Mock.cs:line 73
   at xxxx.vb

Is there something that I can do differently?

Thanks,
Keith

General Discussions

answered on 16 Sep 2010

5 answers

152 views

In the words of Julie Andrews ...

... let's start at the very beginning.

First, I want to apologise for a posting that it only loosely based on JustMock.

I have never written a unit test in my life and thought, given that I have access to JustMock, that I should give it a go and that's why I need help.

I'll explain.

I'm running VS2K8SP1 under Win7 Ultimate to develop Web Sites and Wep Applications.

I've done a bit of reading and have created a Test Project with a Test Method. My reading has led me to understand that I need to decorate my Test Method like this...

[TestMethod]

[HostType("ASP.NET")]

[UrlToTest("http://localhost:50612/TestBed/Default3.aspx")]

Trying to run this test resulting in a fail with the message ...

The test or test run is configured to run in ASP.NET in IIS, but the current user (Tosh-Laptop\Stuart) is not in the Administrators group. Running tests in ASP.NET in IIS requires the user to be in the Administrators group.

The thing is, I am in the Administrators group. The output from the command net localgroup Administrators confirms this ...

C:\Users\Stuart>net localgroup Administrators

Alias name Administrators

Comment Administrators have complete and unrestricted access to the compu

ter/domain

Members

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Administrator

Stuart

The command completed successfully.

So, I guess I'm missing something. Is anyone here running tests under a similar environment? Is anyone here better versed in what's needed to get me running.

Any help, either here, or - if you feel the response too off-topic for posting here - direct to me at sejhemming@gmail.com would be much appreciated.

--
Stuart

General Discussions

answered on 07 Sep 2010

1 answer

111 views

Documentation error?

This refers to both the installed and online version of the docs.

If you go to figure 6 of this page you will see that includes a reference to the method Mock.CreateInstance<>().

Now, I've really only just started playing with JM, but I think that is is wrong.

--
Stuart

General Discussions

answered on 06 Sep 2010

5 answers

163 views

mscorlib mocking without access to instance

The example, in the documentation, for mocking mscorlib types assumes that you have direct access to the object you want to mock from the unit test. However, I'm trying to mock a filesystem scenario and the code that I'm testing creates its own instance of the DirectoryInfo type that I want to mock.

Here's what my code looks like:

public class TypeBeingTested

{

public TypeBeingTested()

{

var folder = new DirectoryInfo("C:\\Program Files");

var folders = folder.GetDirectories("Microsoft Visual Studio 8");

if (folders.Length == 0)

throw new DirectoryNotFoundException("Visual Studio 2005 is not installed.");

}

I want to test the scenario where the Visual Studio folder cannot be found on my disk. The way I thought I could do this, looks like this:

[TestInitialize]

public void Mock_DirectoryInfo()

{

Mock.Partial<DirectoryInfo>().For<string>((folder, name) => folder.GetDirectories(name));

}

[TestMethod]

[ExpectedException(typeof(DirectoryNotFoundException))]

public void Missing_Program_Files_folder_throws_exception()

{

var folder = new DirectoryInfo("C:\\Program Files");

Mock.Arrange(() => folder.GetDirectories("Microsoft Visual Studio 8")).Returns(new DirectoryInfo[] {});

var instance = new TypeBeingTested();

Assert.Fail("No exception was raised in TypeBeingTested constructor.");

}

Obviously, that instance of "folder" in my test method isn't being used for anything other than the Arrange statement... I knew as I was writing that, that this wasn't going to work; but, I can't figure out how this test should be constructed.

Can anyone help?

Thanks!

General Discussions

answered on 27 Aug 2010

1 answer

103 views

JustMock support for Setup/Teardown methods

Is there support for setup/teardown methods in JustMock?

General Discussions

answered on 27 Aug 2010

1 answer

153 views

Mocking a static method in Silverlight

I’m getting the following error when trying to mock a static function in a silverlight unit test:

“There were some problems intercepting the mock call. Optionally, please make sure that you have turned on JustMock's profiler while mocking concrete members.”

I don’t get the error in a full .NET unit test project, so, I wondered whether I was missing a setting or something?

My code from my silverlight unit test project is below. I get the error on the Mock.Arrange() line

Imports Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting

Imports Telerik.JustMock

<TestClass()> _

Public Class Tests

<TestMethod()> _

Public Sub SharedMethodMustBeCalled()

Mock.Arrange(Function() SharedStuff.GetSomething(Arg.AnyString)).MustBeCalled()

Dim SomeClass As New SomeClass

Dim ret As String = SomeClass.DoSomething()

Mock.Assert(SomeClass)