I dug through the forums and found this post
http://www.telerik.com/community/forums/justmock/general-discussions/how-to-set-up-property-assignment.aspx

I have the Free Edition, Telerik.JustMock.dll File Version 2011.1.315.0
The promise of a build available next week in August 2010, doesn't prove to work with Behavior.CallOriginal.  (an empty Constructor works though).

Here is a sample of my TestMethod

I tried the above code with no parameters for the constructor, all 3 behaviour enums for the Constructor, but nothing works.
I tried to do some code where I stored the name parameter as a local variable to the test and implement my own logic, but I can't seem to get the actual value in ArrangeSet.  I tried to do something like:


But there is nothing like that. Is there another solution?
Thanks

Hello,

In Moq it's easy to set up property assignment behavior, for example:

            var monkey = new Mock<IMonkey>();
            monkey.SetupAllProperties();
            monkey.Object.Name = "Spike";
            Assert.AreEqual("Spike", monkey.Object.Name);

In Typemock it's not even necessary to call an analog of SetupAllProperties:

            var monkey = Isolate.Fake.Instance<IMonkey>();
            monkey.Name = "Spike";
            Assert.AreEqual("Spike", monkey.Name);

With JustMock I can't find any method that would assign a property value on a mocked instance. The following code fails in assertion:

            var monkey = Mock.Create<IMonkey>();
            Mock.ArrangeSet(() => { monkey.Name = "Spike"; });
            monkey.Name = "Spike";
            Assert.AreEqual("Spike", monkey.Name); // FAILS!

How do I need to configure property assignment?

Thanks in advance

I have a unit test that, when run via the Resharper test runner (which uses NUnit), passes.  However, if I run the same test via the nunit-console (as executed by PartCover), I get the following error:

Test Error : Core.Busi.Unit_Tests.MILSearchJustMockTests.TestGetRetiredItemByID_JustMock
   Telerik.JustMock.MockException : There were some problems intercepting the mock call. Optionally, please make sure that you have turned on JustMock's profiler while mocking concrete members.
   at Telerik.JustMock.Expectations.Expectation.?(Invocation invocation) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\Expectations\Expectation.cs:line 37
   at Telerik.JustMock.Expectations.Expectation.Process[TResult](Invocation invocation) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\Expectations\Expectation.cs:line 18
   at Telerik.JustMock.Mock..?.?(? x) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\Mock.cs:line 75
   at ?.?.?[?,?]( instruction, Func`2 function) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\MockContext.cs:line 238
   at Telerik.JustMock.Mock.Arrange[TResult](Expression`1 expression) in c:\B\Basilisk\Basilisk CI Build\Sources\CodeBase\Telerik.JustMock\Mock.cs:line 72
   at Core.Busi.Unit_Tests.MILSearchJustMockTests.SetupMocks() in C:\sd\Trunk\core\Asm\Busi\Busi\Unit Tests\MILSearch.JustMock.cs:line 51

I made sure the JustMock is enabled.  I even recompiled the PartCover.dll with the instructions mentioned here, but I still get the same issue.  Is there something I need to register to run the console version of nunit/PartCover? 

Please let me know if you need more information.  Thanks!


   at Core.Busi.Unit_Tests.MILSearchJustMockTests.TestGetRetiredItemByID_JustMock() in C:\sd\Trunk\core\Asm\Busi\Busi\Unit Tests\MILSearch.JustMock.cs:line 67

I'm trying to Mock an HttpWebRequest (from the System.Net namespace) object, but I keep getting runtime errors.  It seems that the only constructor for HttpWebRequest is protected and has been Deprecated by Microsoft.  If this is the case, how would I could about Mocking an object which doesn't give access to it's constructor?

Here is my code.  It dies when Arranging the HttpUtils.CreateWebRequest call.  CreateWebRequest is  a static method of the non-static class HttpUtils.

private HttpWebRequest _webRequestMock;

private void SetupMocks()
{
	_webRequestMock = Mock.Create<HttpWebRequest>();

_webResponseMock = Mock.Create<WebResponse>();
Mock.SetupStatic<HttpUtils>(Behavior.Strict);
Mock.Arrange(() => HttpUtils.CreateWebRequest(Arg.IsAny<string>())).Returns(_webRequestMock);
Mock.Arrange(() => _webRequestMock.GetResponse()).Returns(_webResponseMock);
}

Hi!

When I use Arg.IsAny in the arrange for a private method, as follows:

 

Mock.NonPublic.Arrange<bool>(

target,

"IsUSPriceChangeOnCanadianAdoptedRSTitle",

mockedDBTrans,

Arg.IsAny<TitleRequestDataset.TitleRequestRow>())

.DoInstead( () => {calledIsUSPriceChangeOnCanadianAdoptedRSTitle =  true;} )

.Returns(true);

 
I get an ArgumentException at run time with the following message:

Direct null valued argument for non-public member is not supported. Use ArgExpr.IsNull<T>() or other members from ArgExpr wrapper class to provide your specification.

Please advise on how to get around this.

Thanks,
Asim

Hi,
I would really like to implement JustMock into some of our projects. However, it is causing our PostSharp aspects to puke during compilation when it is installed. Gael mentioned that they were able to work with TypeMock to work out conflicts between those products. Is there any possibility of you guys working with them to get these conflicts resolved too? We see major benefits to using both products and would love the ability for them to exist in harmony.
ian

Hi folks,

I am trying to use JustMock to mock a SharePoint collection (the real thing cannot be used as it fails without a SharePoint context). I cannot figure out how to add items the collection. Here is my code.

I would like to add the SPRoleDefinition instance called role to the SPRoleDefinitionBindingCollection. The uut.Add call is obviously being ignored, which is indicated by the fact that uut.Count is zero. I would expect this to work...

Can you help?

Thanks in advance and kr, Bernd.

Hi!

Suppose my method-under-test looks like this:

public void TestMe()
{
    DataSet d1 = null;
    DataSet d2 = null;
    bool process = false;
    Helper helper = new Helper();
    process = helper.LoadFromDB(out d1, out d2) && d1 != null && d1.Tables[0] != null && d1.Tables[0].Count > 0

    if (process)
    {
        [...run business logic here...]
    }
    else
    {
        throw new Exception("Failed to load data from the db");
    }
}

In order to circumvent using a physical database, I mock "helper.LoadFromDB" in my unit test. The delegate I use in the "DoInstead" method populates the test1DS and test2DS datasets with made-up data, and the "Returns" in my arrange returns true.

 

Mock.Arrange(() =>  helper.LoadFromDB(out test1DS, out test2DS))

.DoInstead(someDelegate)

.Returns(true);

 
The problem is that the data sets the mock implementation populates are the ones declared within the unit test, not the ones declared in the method-under-test. So the process flag in the code snippet above still returns false (due to d1 being null), and the business logic I wanted to test (within the "if (process)" block above) never gets run.

Is there a way to map (for lack of a better word) the test1DS and test2DS (that I declared in the unit test code and populated in my DoInstead delegate) to the data sets d1 and d2 declared within the method-under-test, so as to allow the process flag to evaluate to true once the mocked implementation has run?

Thanks,
Asim

This took some time to figure out so I thought I put a note out here in case anybody else runs into this problem.  I was running into errors when trying to run tests with JustMock Enabled in the elevated state.  The issue turned out to be that I had enabled Intellitrace and forgotten about it.  Looks like there can't be two profilers running at the same time.

Hi!

Does JustMock allow invoking the actual constructor of the mocked object, and passing it certain argument values, similar to how TypeMock does (please see TypeMock documentation link below)?

http://docs.typemock.com/Isolator/##typemock.chm/Documentation/ConstructorArgumentsAAA.html

Thanks,
Asim