Hi I would like to test this piece of code:


And I tried to test it like this:

What I am doing wrong?

Hi,

I tried to do some MsCorLib Mocking following the Datetime.Now example (http://www.telerik.com/help/justmock/advanced-usage-mscorlib-mocking.html) and adjust it for Stopwatch.GetTimestamp().

But somehow it does not work - What do I miss?
Any help or hints would be great

Tobias

Is it possible to integrate JustMock with OpenCover?
I found only information with PartCover but I couldn't find similiar file in OpenCover. 

Hello, 

I'm trying to make a setup on my TeamCity server with JustMock and dotCover. Unsuccessful, unfortunately.

When all three elements work together I'm getting "Profiler must be enabled" exception during tests phase (tests with static mocking).
I followed all recommendations from Telerik.
When I use TeamCity with JustMock  without  dotCover - tests are passing without a problem.
I'm also able to run tests without TeamCity (in Visual Studio or executing msbuild from console) using JustMock and dotCover together (on the same machine). No problem here.

But when I use all three together - "Profiler must be enabled" exception got raised.

I'm trying to use MSTest Build Step with .NET Coverage enabled.

Do you have any recommendation on how to run it? May be someone had implemented this kind of configuration?

Thanks,

Alex

Hi,

I am working on an MVC 4 project againt .net 4.5 on Visual Studio 2012.  JustMock works great until I try to mock an extention method.
Here ist what I did:
- Installed JustMock from the msi file
- In Visual StudioTelerik\JustMock doesn't offer the menu "Enable JustMock"/"Disable JustMock" but "Enable Profiler" and "Disable Profiler".  Enabled is chosen.  (http://www.telerik.com/help/justmock/advanced-usage.html)
- Callling options I can select dot.cover (product from JetBrains)
I mock an extention method as recommended in the documentation (http://www.telerik.com/help/justmock/advanced-usage-extension-methods-mocking.html)

Mock.Arrange(() => projekte.WithPath(Arg.IsAny<IPrefetchPath2>())).Returns(projekte).MustBeCalled();

WithPath is the extention method.

The test fails
- first I get a message box that says "vstest.executionengine.exe has stopped working"
- i have to close the messagebox
- in the test explorer the following message is given: 

System.InvalidOperationException: There is no method 'WithPath' on type 'SupportClasses.QueryableExtensionMethods' that matches the specified arguments

Thank you for your support on this issue!

Hi, I am testing this piece of code:

public void SaveChanges()

       {
           try
           {
              //some code here
           }
           catch (MyException dbEValEx)
           {
               RaiseValidationError(dbEValEx);
           }
           catch (MySecondException dbUpdateException)
           {
               RaiseUpdateException(dbUpdateException);
           }
       }

What I would like is to force that exception in some way, right now I have tried this:

//Class to be tested
var fooUnitOfWork = Mock.Create<UnitOfWork>(Behavior.CallOriginal);
//Mock private method
Mock.NonPublic.Arrange(fooUnitOfWork, "RaiseValidationError", dbEntityValidationException).DoNothing().MustBeCalled();
//Execute method to test
fooUnitOfWork.SaveChanges();

Mock.Arrange(() => fooUnitOfWork.SaveChanges()).Throws(new DbEntityValidationException());
//Make sure that the RaiseDBValidationError is called
Mock.Assert(fooUnitOfWork);

Any ideas of how to do it?

Hi, I would like to test this static method:

public static class UnitOfWorkExtensions
{ 
 
        public static void SetSubCategory(this IOperationTracer tracer, string subCategory)
        {
            UnitOfWork unitOfWork = UnitOfWork.Current;
            if (unitOfWork != null && unitOfWork.CorrelationId != null)
            {
                tracer.SetSubCategory(UnitOfWork.Current.CorrelationId, subCategory);
            }
        }
}

I am implementing the test like this:
[TestMethod]
      public void SetSubCategoryTest()
      {
          Mock.SetupStatic(typeof(UnitOfWorkExtensions));
          IOperationTracer operationTracer = Mock.Create<OperationTracer>();
 
 
          Mock.Arrange(() => operationTracer.SetSubCategory(null, "subCategory")).DoNothing().OccursNever();
 
          UnitOfWorkExtensions.SetSubCategory(operationTracer, "subCategory");
          Mock.Assert(operationTracer);
 
          UnitOfWork.Current = new UnitOfWork();
          UnitOfWork.Current.CorrelationId = "11111";
 
          Mock.Arrange(() => operationTracer.SetSubCategory(null, "subCategory")).DoNothing().OccursOnce();
 
          UnitOfWorkExtensions.SetSubCategory(operationTracer, "subCategory");
          Mock.Assert(operationTracer);
 
      }
The test is failing and I don't have a clue why

Hi JustMock team,

I'm trying to test that methods are being called in the correct order. I have the following code in one of my tests:

 var busyMonitor = Mock.Create<IBusyMonitor>();
target.BusyMonitor = busyMonitor;
Mock.Arrange(() => busyMonitor.RegisterActivity(Arg.IsAny<BusyActivity>())).InOrder();
Mock.Arrange(() => busyMonitor.UnregisterActivity(Arg.IsAny<BusyActivity>())).InOrder();
target.DoSomethiing();

Mock.Assert(busyMonitor);

Calling target.DoSomething involves calling BusyMonitor.RegisterActivity and BusyMonitot.UnregisterActivity methods. However I'm getting an exception when target objject insance calls BusyMonitor.UnregisterActivity. 

The excepcion thrown is an ArgumentNullException with message:"Value cannot be null. Parameter name: source"

Hi,

I'm new to mocking and am playing with JustMock to mock Entity Framework 4. Therefore, my understanding of what I want to happen may be a reflection of my lack of understanding of mocking principles/implementation.

I have browsed around and found some resources, but they're not all that clear. Have seen:

• http://www.telerik.com/help/justmock/basic-usage-entity-framework-mocking.html (note that the cropping of code is less than useful, has to expose the source and find the "missing" text in the code snippet)
• ms-help://TelerikJustMock/TelerikJustMock/html/01863dc3-bc4b-4b97-8e3a-ea444c23d994.htm

What I want to do is establish a mock of my EF entities, and access them without database.

So far, I have:


This still wants the ConnectionString to appear in the app.config file of the Test DLL, which I would hope wouldn't be required? Without it, the default constructor throws an exception. Question 1: So am I right in thinking any unit tests I mock in this way are dependant on the DB - sort of making it a bit pointless?

My next task is to create an object and add it to the mocked entities:


I understand this, and my object does indeed appear in the userAccounts collection. Win.

So in my head, I have an entity framework entities collection that I have mocked and primed with a user account. I would like to pass that into another class:


This uses the EF Model to return the user and authenticate their details.

This leaves the Question 2: when this code runs, the UserAccounts collection within the mocked Entities object is (understandably) null. Where am I going wrong? Am I wrong to expect to be able to prime the mocked entities with a single object and be able to use that?

Any help appreciated, I've made time in my project to work on Mocking and I need to get to grips with this fast!

Nathan

I have a mock and have set up a call to DoInstead on it, something like this: -


Later on in my test, I call an Assert on that same method: -


When it hits the Assert line, my DoInstead handler suddenly gets fired. It's as if the Assertion is actually called the mock method like my production code has. Even worse, if I put a Match on the Arrange call e.g.


but this is completely ignored and it still falls into the Console.WriteLine call.

At any rate, calls to Assert should not implicitly call DoInstead handlers that have already been set up.