I believe that the more useful auto-mocking behavior here would be for the returned task to be in a completed state containing an auto-mocked T.  For example, if the function to be mocked returns a Task<IMyInterface>, I believe the automocker should return the equivalent of Task.FromResult(Mock.Create<IMyInterface>()).

When writing async friendly code, the auto-mocker isn't very useful because none of my async methods never complete.  I have to manually Mock.Arrange every method so it will return a mocked Task.FromResult.  In most cases, I would prefer the happy path be default (tasks complete with results) rather than the unhappy path be the default.

Hello,

I have unit tests that are working fine locally in Visual Studio 2013, but when the build runs on TFS and attempts to run the Unit Tests it fails with the following:

Test method WingsServicesTests.Unit.LoanIntegrationServiceTests.AddressNeedsUpdating_GetSingleValueFromField threw exception:
Telerik.JustMock.Core.ElevatedMockingException: Cannot mock 'Boolean IsHostUp()'. The profiler must be enabled to mock, arrange or execute the specified target

I searched the forums and found referneces to this article: http://www.telerik.com/help/justmock/integration-msbuild-tasks.html

I was not sure where the items referenced in that article should be placed, so I put them in all 3 project files in the solution, including the test project, but it still doesn't work.I have set both "Perform Code Analysis" and "Analyze Test Impact" to false in the build definition, thinking that those might be the problem if they try to do code coverage.Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Andrew

Hi All,

I am trying to write a Test method using NUnit and JustMock for Mocking.
Our application used Microsofy Identity

When I try to invoke the testmethod, I get an error saying WIF is enabled.

Can anyone please suggest how to bypass the Identity Framework using JustMock.

Hi,
I am trying to mock db access using JustMock. I do have an interface defined and created a mock object from the interface. I then arranged a method to return false for any argument. After arranging the mock object on the second call with unique arguments a null reference exception is thrown. The code snippet below shows what I am trying to do:

IDBAccess fakeDBAccess = Mock.Create<IDBAccess>();
List<ModelType1> fakeModelType1 = GetFakeModelModelType1();
Mock.Arrange(()=> fakeDBAccess.GetModelType1ForPrimaryKey(Arg.Is<long>(1))).Returns(fakeModelType1[0]);
Mock.Arrange(() => fakeDBAccess.GetModelType1ForPrimaryKey(Arg.Is<long>(2))).Returns(fakeModelType1[1]);
List<fakeModelType2> fakeModelType2 = new List<fakeModelType2>();
Mock.Arrange(() => fakeDBAccess.GetModelType2ForPrimaryKey(Arg.IsAny<long>())).Returns(fakeModelType2);
Mock.Arrange(() => fakeDBAccess.GetModelType1Status(Arg.IsAny<ModelType1>())).Returns(false);
ClassUnderTest OUT = new ClassUnderTest(fakeDBAccess );

On debugging the above code try to call fakeDBAccess.GetModelType1Status() with two different values say fakeModelType[0] and fakeModelType[1] (in the watch window) the first call succeeds and returns false but the second call fails with a null reference exception. The order of calls do not matter. It is always  the second call that throws the null reference exception. Can you please confirm whether this is a bug or not. If this is a bug can you please suggest a work around?

How to Test Protected Static method in Abstract Class using JustMock 

Trying to write tests for some legacy code and I have a question about mocking fields or other references inside a mock. In the code below, "Assert.IsNotNull(member.Rsa)" will fail because the mocked constructor of member hasn't created anything. Currently I've solved the problem by creating a separate mock and assigning to it, but is this really the best way to do this?

Hi All, We have a requirement where we have to use NUnit to write test methods and JustMock for mocking the application.
Our application is exposing WCF services and the unit tests will be written to test the WCF Operations. We are using VS 2013.In our application we are using Dependency injection while calling the Constructor i.e. the parameters to the Constuctor are created using Dependency injection. Please refer below sample
 
 public NetworkService(IDbContextFactory<NetworkDbContext> contextFactory, IEventBus eventBus, HostService hostService, UserManagementService userManagementService)
         {
             _contextFactory = contextFactory.ThrowIfNull("contextFactory");
             _eventBus = eventBus.ThrowIfNull("eventBus");
             _hostService = hostService.ThrowIfNull("hostService");
             _userManagementService = userManagementService.ThrowIfNull("userManagementService");
       } 

I tried mocking using Telerik Justmock to create the objects of ContextFactory, EventBus etc. but the object created using mocking was of type Proxy of actual object rather than the object itself i.e. Proxy of IEventBus rather than IEventBus.The _contextFactory object is used to create a context like below

 using (var ctx = _contextFactory.Create()) 

But as the object is of type Proxy(Object) I am unable to create the context ctx in above scenario. Hence the controls goes to the Service but
when it tries to use context object ctx, it throws an "Null Reference exception" and hence the testing fails. 

Can anyone please suggest if there is any issue with the above and suggest on alternate solution using NUnit and JustMock. 

Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Hi All,We have a requirement where we have to use NUnit to write test methods and JustMock for mocking the application. Dep injOur application is exposing WCF services and the unit tests will be written to test the WCF Operations.We are using VS 2013.In our application we are using Dependency injection while calling the Constructor i.e. the parameters to the Constuctor are created

using Dependency injection.Pls refer below
public NetworkService(IDbContextFactory<NetworkDbContext> contextFactory, IEventBus eventBus, HostService hostService, UserManagementService userManagementService)
        {
            _contextFactory = contextFactory.ThrowIfNull("contextFactory");
            _eventBus = eventBus.ThrowIfNull("eventBus");
            _hostService = hostService.ThrowIfNull("hostService");
            _userManagementService = userManagementService.ThrowIfNull("userManagementService");
      }

I tried mocking using Telerik Justmock to create the objects of ContextFactory/EventBus etc but the object create using mocking was of type Proxy of actual object rather than the object itself i.e. Proxy of IEventBus rather than IEventBus.The issue with this is, the _contextFactory object is used to create a context like below
using (var ctx = _contextFactory.Create())

But as the object is of type Proxy(Object) I am unable to create the context ctx in above scenario and hence the testing fails.

Can anyone please help me with the mocking.

Any help will be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

I am using CallMethod to call a private method and it works great, but I need to call a method that has some ref parameters, Is it possible to do that
Also i would like to compare the values in the ref after the method execution finishes, basically instead of returning one value method is manipulating multiple values and i need to Assert all of them

Thanks
vikas

I have enabled the code activity workflow in a TFS build that runs unit tests.  My understanding is that JustMockTestRunner uses MSTest.exe to execute them.  Is it possible to use VSTest.Console.exe instead?