Hi,

  I have a MessageBox.Show method, which has a CallBack action associated with it. I want to Pass a Mocked parameter to that action, which would eventually execute the action statements based on Parameter passed.

  I tried something like below, but it did not work.

 

 I want to execute the Original callback, with a mocked DialogResult. 

How can we do that?

 

Thanks in Advance,

Sagar

 

Hello guys!

 

I get a Telerik.JustMock.Core.ElevatedMockingException when I run: Mock.Arrange(() => _client.GetAsync(Arg.IsAny<string>())).Returns(ShowMeTheMoney());

static async Task<HttpResponseMessage> ShowMeTheMoney()
        {
            HttpRequestMessage httpRequest = new HttpRequestMessage();
            httpRequest.SetConfiguration(new HttpConfiguration());
            HttpResponseMessage response = httpRequest.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK, new List<SmsDTO>() { new SmsDTO()});
            return response;
        } 

    [TestMethod]
        public void GetAll_NullResultTes3t()
        {
            //Assert.IsTrue(Mock.IsProfilerEnabled);
            _client = Mock.Create<HttpClient>();
            _controller = new SmsController(new Persistence(_client));
            _controller.Request = new HttpRequestMessage();           
            Mock.Arrange(() => _client.GetAsync(Arg.IsAny<string>())).Returns(ShowMeTheMoney());
            IEnumerable<SmsDTO> actualResult = _controller.GetAll();
            CollectionAssert.AllItemsAreNotNull(actualResult.ToList());
        }

 

I use VS2015 Enterprise and I have disabled IntelliTrace(Tools>Options>IntelliTrace: Uncheck the Enable IntelliTrace checkbox). Also I enabled the profiler from the JustMock Menu.

I get the following in Event logs:
Info: .NET Runtime version 4.0.30319.0 - The profiler has requested that the CLR instance not load the profiler into this process.  Profiler CLSID: '{9999995d-2cbb-4893-be09-fce80abc7564}'.  Process ID (decimal): 7808.  Message ID: [0x2516].

Info: TraceLog Profiler component initialized successfully, process vstest.executionengine.x86.exe

Info: .NET Runtime version 4.0.30319.0 - The profiler was loaded successfully.  Profiler CLSID: '{9999995d-2cbb-4893-be09-fce80abc7564}'.  Process ID (decimal): 7724.  Message ID: [0x2507].

Error:

The description for Event ID 0 from source Application cannot be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on the local computer.

If the event originated on another computer, the display information had to be saved with the event.

The following information was included with the event: 

Error Handler Exception: System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException: There was an error reading from the pipe: The pipe has been ended. (109, 0x6d). ---> System.IO.IOException: The read operation failed, see inner exception. ---> System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException: There was an error reading from the pipe: The pipe has been ended. (109, 0x6d). ---> System.IO.PipeException: There was an error reading from the pipe: The pipe has been ended. (109, 0x6d).
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.PipeConnection.OnAsyncReadComplete(Boolean haveResult, Int32 error, Int32 numBytes)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ConnectionStream.EndRead(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.Net.FixedSizeReader.ReadCallback(IAsyncResult transportResult)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Net.Security.NegotiateStream.EndRead(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.StreamConnection.EndRead()
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.TransportDuplexSessionChannel.EndTryReceive(IAsyncResult result, Message& message)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DuplexChannelBinder.EndTryReceive(IAsyncResult result, RequestContext& requestContext)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ErrorHandlingReceiver.EndTryReceive(IAsyncResult result, RequestContext& requestContext) \r\n    at System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.TransportDuplexSessionChannel.EndTryReceive(IAsyncResult result, Message& message)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DuplexChannelBinder.EndTryReceive(IAsyncResult result, RequestContext& requestContext)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ErrorHandlingReceiver.EndTryReceive(IAsyncResult result, RequestContext& requestContext)

the message resource is present but the message is not found in the string/message table

Info: .NET Runtime version 4.0.30319.0 - The profiler has requested that the CLR instance not load the profiler into this process.  Profiler CLSID: '{b7abe522-a68f-44f2-925b-81e7488e9ec0}'.  Process ID (decimal): 6696.  Message ID: [0x2516].

 According to regedit, CLSID: '{9999995d-2cbb-4893-be09-fce80abc7564} corresponds to IntelliTrace and  CLSID: '{b7abe522-a68f-44f2-925b-81e7488e9ec0}' to CodeWeaverProfiler class. 

 Could you please help?

 

Thanks!

Let's say I have a class

 

class MyClass
{
    public virtual void MyFunc1( DateTime somedate)
    {}

    public virtual void MyFunc2( )
    {
       MyFunc1(SomeObject.SentDate)

    }

}

where SomeObject has a field called SentDate.

SomeObject is in a global scope and, for some reasons, I can't provide a value for it so will always be null when mocking.

I can arrange for MyFunc1() to do whatever I want but, when I call MyFunc2(), it will try to evaluate its parameter SomeOject.SentDate and, because SomeObject is null, this will fail with an exception.

Is there a way to skip the evaluation of SomeObject.SentDate parameter?

I have a private Generic method and I want to call it using Private Accessor, How can i do that.

private void PopulateCollection<T>(List<IDataItem> fromCollection, ObservableCollection<T> toCollection){}

 

Thanks

Vikas

 I have this code:

Hello,

I am trying to do Mock.Arrange() in the following manner:

 var practice = Mock.Create<PracticeOptions>();
 Mock.Arrange(() => practice.PolicyExpirationDays).Returns(30);

I am getting the exception in the second line saying that "Cannot mock 'Int32 get_PolicyExpirationDays()'. The profiler must be enabled to mock, arrange or execute the specified target."

I tried updating\removing\installing JustMock on my machine but nothing is working out.

Please look into this asap as it's a bit urgent.

Thanks,

Abdeali

​

If given the following code, is it possible to mock the Base class constructor without mocking the derived class constructor so that MyProp gets set?:

    public class Base
    {
        public Base()
        {
            throw new NotImplementedException();
        }

        public string MyProp { get; set; }
    }

    public class Derived : Base
    {
        public Derived()
        {
            MyProp = "hello";
        }
    }

My team has been using Microsoft Fakes for a while, but recently looked into JustMock and really liked what we saw and wanted to use JustMock going forward and slowly replace all MS Fakes uses to JustMock.  After a bit of hassle getting our Build Server to handle JustMock appropriately, it seems that none of our tests that used MS Fakes now work, getting the error: Microsoft.QualityTools.Testing.Fakes.UnitTestIsolation.UnitTestIsolationException: Failed to get address of function SetDetourProvider from library 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Telerik\JustMock\Libraries\CodeWeaver\32\Telerik.CodeWeaver.Profiler.dll'.

This is a big problem for us as we have too many tests using Fakes to convert them all at once and can't afford an all or nothing approach here.  Is there a way to get them both working on the same Build Server?  Each solution/build only uses one framework...

Thanks!

I'm trying to understand if JustMock and Microsoft Fakes both have a place in the same project as complementary tools, or if it's a case of choosing one versus the other.

thanks

Hi, I am testing a method whereby a value is set in the method. Initially I set the return value using JustMock. This is SharePoint by the way.

I realize that the .Return is causing the same value to be returned. How can I check that the correct value is being set inside the method / can I get the value which has been set in the method back in the assert.arequal?

 

Thanks,

Gary.