I have a Telerik mvc grid with filter mode set to “GridFilterMode.Row”.
One of the columns is a lookupComboBox modified from this example: http://www.telerik.com/support/code-library/grid-editing-using-combobox-with-remote-binding-and-filtering
Now, the filtering capability for the lookupcombobox does not work at all, please see attached image for details. Same issue can be seen in the example provided by Telerik (see link above).
Has anyone seen this issue? Any ideas on how to get the filter to work properly with the lookupcombobox?
Thanks
7 Answers, 1 is accepted
Would it be possible to share more information about the current implementation, that will help us to observe the depicted erroneous behavior locally? This will help us to review the problem locally and narrow the problem down much faster. A runnable test demo will be of a great help too.
Regards,
Georgi Krustev
Telerik
See What's Next in App Development. Register for TelerikNEXT.

-Ariel
I answered to the support ticket opened on the same subject. I would like to ask you to continue our discussion in only one thread to avoid duplication. Thank you for the understanding.
Here is quote of the answer:
I further investigate the case and I can clarify that the described behavior is expected. The field related to the column in question is an object. In this case, the filter row or the filter menu will not be able to generate a filter widget, as they cannot know how to treat an object filtration. This is applicable to the server filtering too. The send filter expression tries to filter an object by string value, which is unsupported scenario.
With regards to the server filtering, one possible option is to modify the send filter expression in a such way that it will filter a particular field of that object and not the whole object.
With regards to the filter menu and row, you will need to create a custom filter menu in order to handle the object filtration scenario. Please check this online demo for more details. For filter row, you can define custom template too:
.Columns(columns =>
columns.Bound(o => o.OrderDate)
.Filterable(filterable =>
filterable.Cell(cell =>
cell.Template(
"customTemplate"
)
)
)
)
)
Regards,
Georgi Krustev
Telerik
See What's Next in App Development. Register for TelerikNEXT.

Georgi,
Thanks for the reply.Using your example, I was able to implement the “kendoComboBox”; however, I need to pass a “text” as a method parameter to the controller to make the combobox work. So, how can I pass the text input to the controller?
columns.Bound(q => q.Vendor).ClientTemplate("#: data.Vendor ? data.Vendor.Name : '[None]' #") .EditorTemplateName("ComboBoxLookup_Vendor")
.Filterable(filterable => filterable.Cell(cell => cell.Template("vendorFilter"))).Width(200);
function
vendorFilter(container) {
container.element.kendoComboBox({
name:
"vendors"
,
dataTextField:
"Name"
,
dataValueField:
"VendorID"
,
placeholder:
"Select a vendor"
,
autoBind:
false
,
dataSource: {
transport: {
read:
"@Url.Action("
_GetVendors
", "
Quote
")"
,
},
serverFiltering:
false
},
});
}
Controller:
public
ActionResult _GetVendors(
string
text)
Thanks
I would suggest you check the ComboBox overview help topic, which explains how to send additional values to the server. You can also refer to this code library, which uses this approach in action.
Regards,
Georgi Krustev
Telerik
See What's Next in App Development. Register for TelerikNEXT.

Georgi,
The your examples use s
.DataSource(source => { source.Read(read => read.Action("GetProducts", "Home").Data("onAdditionalData"); }); })
I am using:
dataSource: { transport: { read: "@Url.Action("_GetVendors", "Quote")" }, },
Do you have an example I can look at using this approach? thanks
Based on the given information, I suppose that you are skipping the ASP.NET MVC wrapper and initialize the widget instead using JavaScript. If this is the case, then note that the server wrapper actually produces JavaScript initialization script similar to one that you have written.
We do not have demo similar to the shared code library only using JavaScript, but it produces JavaScript initialization scripts that you can use to accomplish your goal.
If the problem still persists, please send us a simple repro demo that depicts the issue. This will help us to review the problem locally and advice you further much faster.
Regards,
Georgi Krustev
Telerik
See What's Next in App Development. Register for TelerikNEXT.