Hi

I'm trying to unit test an ExecuteResult() method of a custom ActionResult. The method uses UrlHelper.GenerateUrl() method to generate the url for given action and controller.
In the unit test I'm constructing the ControllerContext like such:
And then setting static mock for the UrlHelper:
When the runtime hots the GenerateUrl method I'm getting the System.Security.VerificationException "Operation could destabilize the runtime.". The stack trace is not very helpful:
The GenerateUrl() method works fine when I remove static mock declaration but that makes the whole test pointless. Any help please?

I'm trying to mock a method call with a matcher, but JustMock fails to intercept the call properly. This is a test that fails for me:

I'm using JustMock Q2 2012 SP1 (2012.2.813.9).

Hello all,

I try to test if controller object has assigned a method to an event (see sample code at the end). 

I have a controller object, which gets two objects (getCalled & raiseEvent) via an interface. The object getCalled provides a 
method which should be assigned to an event of the object raiseEvent. This should be preformed from within the controller object.
The event can only occur after the raiseEvent.Start method has been called.

I thought, I write an Arrange statement, where the method getCalled.callMe must be called.
Additionally I write an Arrange statement, where an event should be raised, when the raiseEvent.Start method gets called.
Now I create the controller and call the method controller.Start. In this method the the method raiseEvent.Start will be called, which should rasie the Event raiseEvent.calledEvent, which should call the method getCalled.CallMe.
But the testrunner asserts with the message
"Setup contains calls that are marked as "MustBeCalled" but actually never called"

What do I make wrong?

best regards
  Bernhard

Here is the sample code

    using NUnit.Framework;

    using Telerik.JustMock;
    using Telerik.JustMock.Helpers;

    public interface IGetCalled
    {
        void CallMe(EventArgs arg);
    }

    public interface IRaiseEvent
    {
         event EventHandler<EventArgs> calledEvent;
         void Start();
    }

    public class Controller
    {
         private IRaiseEvent raiseEvent;
         private IGetCalled  getCalled;

         public Controller(IGetCalled getCalled, IRaiseEvent raiseEvent)
         {
             this.raiseEvent = raiseEvent;
             this.getCalled  = getCalled; 
     
             this.raiseEvent.calledEvent += (s, e) => this.getCalled.CallMe(e);         
         }
                        
         public void Start()
         {
             raiseEvent.Start();   
         }
    }

    [TestFixture]
    public class test
    {
        [Test]
        public void TestRaiseEvent()
        {
            IRaiseEvent raiseEvent = Mock.Create<IRaiseEvent>();
            IGetCalled getCalled = Mock.Create<IGetCalled>();

            getCalled.Arrange(x => x.CallMe(new EventArgs())).MustBeCalled();
            Mock.Arrange(() => raiseEvent.Start()).Raises(() => raiseEvent.calledEvent += null, new EventArgs());
            var controller = new Controller(getCalled, raiseEvent);

            controller.Start();
            getCalled.Assert();
        }
    }

I have a method that uses an OpenAccess model. I want to mock out an OptimisticVerificationException in the first (and only first) call to SaveChanges(). How can this be achieved?

Hi,
we are having problems running out tests in large testruns.
In this forum I read, that I have to use the Mock.Initialize<T> Method to init the Object I like to mock, if I had instances of this class in preceding tests.
Do I have to call this Initialize Method also for the base classes, my object ist derived from?

Thank you very much
Christian

I have a unit test that has two calls to SaveChanges() when the first attempt to call SaveChanges() throws an OptimisticVerificationException, a refresh of the object occurs and then a second attempt is made. When writing my unit test I arranged the following expectations:


What is interesting is that the call to: Mock.Arrange(() => _mockModel.SaveChanges()).Occurs(2); actually breaks the next two lines (the one that throws on the first SaveChanges() in sequence). Regardless of where Occurs(n) appears in the arrange, it breaks the throw. Simply commenting it out allows the test to run as expected.

Am I doing something wrong or is there a defect here?

I get this exception "Telerik.JustMock.MockException: Opps , there were some error intercepting target call" when attempting to setup a static mock:

Hi there,
I am trying to mock the InnerException-Property of a Mocked SqlException.



I will be grateful for any help.

Normen

Hi there!

Let's suppose I have a very simple class like this:


I honestly have tried to Mock this method considering the fact that it may be called with an unpredictable number of arguments on "par" when running the tests. But I was unable to find something like this on JustMock documentation. I found many examples where you have to set exactly the number of arguments passed. Also mocking the second parameter as Args.IsAny<object[]>() doesnt work.

Can anyone help me on this question, please?