Hello,

similiary to Alexander in http://www.telerik.com/community/forums/justmock/general-discussions/justmock-dotcover-teamcity-problem.aspx thread i'm trying to make satup for unit test running nunit+justMock+dotcover, and i'm facing problems similiar to Alexander's, thus i created simple test as suggested in mentioned thread:

Assert.IsTrue(Mock.IsProfilerEnabled);

which results in following output:

I followed manual http://www.telerik.com/help/justmock/integration-teamcity.html section Integrating JustMock within TeamCity using MS Test or NUnit build steps with dotCover and Profiler is linked to dotCover (the only one installed is the one bundled with TeamCity) and JUSTMOCK_INSTANCE=1 variable is present in build parameters.

tests run in VS2012, also when configured accordingly to Integrating JustMock within TeamCity using MS Test or NUnit build steps.

Telerik.JustMock - 2013.2.611.0
TeamCity - 7.1.5 (build 24400)

is there any thing that can be done in order to configure justmock to run on teamcity with nUint and dotCover?

Hello,

I have the following code:


As you can see I have an out parameter, I have not figure out how to mock virtualCount, what I did is created a variable in my test method which I do not like.   Can you provide an example of how to do that?

Also, if you can provide an example how to mock a ref parameter as well please?

Also, how can Mock a delegate that I pass into method under test, right now I create a method in my test class that matches the delegate signature and pass that across, is there a better option?

I am using 2013.2.701.0 version.

I'm using/implementing JustMock for the first time.  I've watched the webnair, but I can't seem to get the Mocked object working properly.  We have a full paid version of JustMock.

I have an internal database access layer object, "OperationsData", and an "ComponentException" object with a private constructor.  I'm trying to write the unit test method for the Persist method of the ComponentException object.  The unit tests are all in a separate project so the internal class and the private constructor use a "_Accessor".

When I run the unit test it complains that OperationsData connection string isn't instantiated.  Why isn't it just using the mocked object and return the expectedExceptionId that I want?  Thanks.

This is the ComponentException.Persist() ...
This is the UnitTest...

PS.  I also tried...

I'm calling a mock on multiple threads. Sometimes this works just fine. But sometimes the mock call fails with a System.ArgumentException "An item with the same key has already been added.". Here's the end of the stack trace: -


Now I'm not using any dictionaries in my code - is it possible that this is happening somewhere inside the mock?

I'm trying to create a mock version of UserProfileManager in order to effectively unit test a Sharepoint 2010 Web Part
Every time I run this code, I get the the exception being thrown below. I've verified that the feature works when I debug the code that calls UserProfileManager on the Sharepoint machine - two different Sharepoint machines, in fact.
Here is the code in question:


Unable to create instance of class SharePoint.MyWebPart.Test.MyTest. Error: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The trial period for this product has expired..
    at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfileManagerBase.ValidateLicensing()
   at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfileManagerBase..ctor(SPServiceContext serviceContext)
   at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfileManagerBase..ctor(SPServiceContext serviceContext, Boolean ignorePrivacy)
   at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileManager..ctor(SPServiceContext serviceContext, Boolean IgnoreUserPrivacy, Boolean backwardCompatible)
   at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileManager..ctor(SPServiceContext serviceContext)
   at Castle.Proxies.UserProfileManagerProxy..ctor(IEventsMixin, IMockReplicator, IMockMixin, IInterceptor[], SPServiceContext)
   at DynamicMethod_6f2d60ffa4f94cb4ba57556150461ef9(Object[])
   at “•.—.Ÿ.€()
   at “•.’•.Œ•[–](Func`1 ‹•)
   at “•.—.ˆ—(Type ‹, Object[] €)
   at –.”.(Type , List`1 ‘, Type Ž, Object[] “)
   at –.”.(Type Ž, Type[] , ProxyGenerationOptions Š“, Object[] “, IInterceptor[] )
   at Telerik.JustMock.Core.MocksRepository.Create(Type ‹, Object[] €, IEnumerable`1 ˆ–, IEnumerable`1 ‰–, IEnumerable`1 Š–, Type[] ‚–, Boolean ƒ–, Boolean €, IEnumerable`1 ˆ)
   at .‹–.Create(MocksRepository €–, Type ‹, Object[] –, Nullable`1 , Type[] ‚–, Nullable`1 ƒ–, IEnumerable`1 ˆ, List`1 ‰–, List`1 Š–, List`1 ˆ–)
   at Telerik.JustMock.Mock.›.’Ÿ()
   at “•.’•.Š•[–](Func`1 ‹•)
   at Telerik.JustMock.Mock.Create(Object[] args)

Has anyone else seen this issuue?

I'm trying to write some unit tests for a Sharepoint 2010 Webpart that uses UserProfile manager.
In order to mock UserProfileManager, I also need to mock SPServiceContext.

When I try to assign my mock variable, like this:


The following exception is thrown:

Type 'Telerik.JustMock.MockException' in assembly 'Telerik.JustMock, Version=2013.1.507.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=721b6c5bc0326b3a' is not marked as serializable.

Any idea what I'm doing wrong?

I am using the Professional version of JustMock and cannot seem to raise events.  Version 2013.1.220.3

When I call Mock.Raise() I receive 

• NullReferenceException was unhandled by user code.  Object reference not set to an instance of an object 

Recently, there were several client reports about interference between some of the default JustMock shortcuts inside Visual Studio. The conflicting shortcuts were the ones, used for enabling and disabling the JustMock profiler (JustMock.EnableProfiler and JustMock.DisableProfiler). The default keys for these commands were:

• Ctrl + Alt + [
• Ctrl + Alt + ]
  

It appeared these combinations are commonly used for typing the following symbols: { or [ and } or ]. The issue is possible to appear only on a certain keyboard layouts (e.g. Italian, Canadian-French, etc.)

This is already fixed in the upcoming JustMock official release. We have changed the shortcuts to not interfere with the user environment in such ways. The new shortcuts for enabling and disabling the profiler will be:

• Ctrl + Shift + [     -     for JustMock.EnableProfiler
  
• Ctrl + Shift + ]     -     for JustMock.DisableProfiler
  

As a workaround, until the next version is out, you can change the shortcuts from inside Visual Studio by performing the following:

1. From Tools menu, go to Options;
2. Navigate to Environment > Keyboard;
3. Inside the "Show commands containing" text box write: JustMock
4. Then find JustMock.EnableProfiler and JustMock.DisableProfiler and remove or change their shortcuts as you want (you can also change the rest of the JustMock shortcuts if required). Note that, you will need to remove the old shortcuts in order to disable them.

Hi,

suppose my applicaiton contains several layers, the lowest one is a DAL (Data Access Layer) interfacing with a DB.
Now, I want to unit-test a method of a class in the upper layer which eventually calls a method in the DAL. Naturally, I want to mock only the DB, not the mid-layer classes.
How should I go about unit-testing a high-layer method as mentioned above?

Thanks,
Michael

Hi, I am running into a small issue with justmock. I am using nunit as my testing framework which allows base classes with multiple TestFixtureSetup methods when running a single test. I will create and inject my common mocks in the base class TestFixtureSetup method. Then my test class(inheriting the base class) will do the arranging and testing.

The issue is when the method being mocked is called, it acts like the arrange never excuted. I can verify that all the code ran in the order expected, but my mocked methods are just returning nulls.

Below I have a simple example of what I'm trying to explain.



This does work when the test class has a TestFixtureSetUp of its own and calls the base class setup method, but the base class setup method cannot have the TestFixtureSetUp attribute. Does this mean that the arrange has to execute within the same fixture as the create?
Is there a better way to utilize a base class in this manner? Is this intended?

On a side note, this method was working a couple days ago when I had checked my code in. I will revert my tests to see if i stumbled upon some way to get this to work, I may have had the attributes in just the right places possibly?