This question is locked. New answers and comments are not allowed.
Hello,
I noticed an issue using the following steps:
1) Edit the date manually to an invalid value (i.e. set 13 as the month)
2) make the input lose focus. The input correctly gains the class t-state-error.
3) Give focus back to the input but do not change the value. Leave it as an invalid value.
4) Remove focus from the input.
The input no longer has the class t-state-error and everything seems fine.
Shouldn't the validation be reapplied to the input when focus is lost so that it keeps the t-state-error class?
Also, is there a method we could call on the datetime picker to see if it is in a valid state?
I noticed an issue using the following steps:
1) Edit the date manually to an invalid value (i.e. set 13 as the month)
2) make the input lose focus. The input correctly gains the class t-state-error.
3) Give focus back to the input but do not change the value. Leave it as an invalid value.
4) Remove focus from the input.
The input no longer has the class t-state-error and everything seems fine.
Shouldn't the validation be reapplied to the input when focus is lost so that it keeps the t-state-error class?
Also, is there a method we could call on the datetime picker to see if it is in a valid state?