First of thanks for alphabetizing your product lists in the forums and downloads, it's a big help.  One question on how you name you releases, why is Q1 coming out in March?  Why not make the Q_ the first month of the quarter vice the last so that the second and third month of the quarter become the SP months for that quarter.  Ex January becomes Q1 Release, February Q1 SP1, March Q1 SP2, April starts over with Q2.

Obviously it's not a big deal but I think it seems to make more sense.

Al

What is up with the forums?
I can't seem to run any searches today - anyone else having troubles?
I checked from another system in my office and same thing.

Any idea when this will get fixed?

Hello,
I think it's very good if you can make title of pages more specified to content of post (i think title of post is good) becuase when we save any page from forum file name take this name
Forums  telerik  Learn more about ASP_NET, AJAX and r_a_d_controls.htm

Best Regards

This may not be something many customers might find useful, but I am currently doing some custom Web Part development in Sharepoint Portal Server 2003 and was wondering if anyone might find the information useful--I could post some examples of how I integrated r.a.d controls in Sharepoint, such as r.a.d. editor, r.a.d. treeview, r.a.d. menu, and r.a.d. grid (I may be working with some additional controls soon).

If anyone has any interested in this information let me know and I will gladly adapt some examples to post--with Telerik's permission, of course ;-)

Hello,
I think it's good if you can provide a place in site for reporting bugs of Telerik web site

Regards

I have a textured (1000x800) background (not bg color). On that I want to over lay an imge that is text. I have both the files in Photoshop. For the text file, I type in the text and then do Convert to Shape. But when I save it for web, a white box appears around the text. I want to do this because I could save images that show on top of my textured background and these images could be menu items.

In doing updates with some applications that are using nearly all of the controls, I find it much quicker to overwrite the entire RadControls folder in the root of the app.  More often than I'd like to admit, this over-writes the customizations that I've made to any of the xml config files for each control.  Now, I know that may sound like a bit of whining, and I know that all I'd have to do is backup the configuration files before over-writing, but maybe I can propose another solution that would become the default.

This would be to have another folder at the root of the application, called RadControlsConfig, which would contain all of the xml files for each control that define its configuration.  Within that folder would be a folder for each control as necessary, as well as a file called "globals.xml" which could define for all the controls, properties that are shared between them.

Again, I know that this can be accomplished now by creating these folders myself, and moving all the necessary files over.  However, that would also entail changing the default location where the controls "look" for these files.  What I'm thinking about here is that by default, a developer could update all the controls by overwriting the entire RadControls folder without affecting customizations.

Probably a much more complicated thing to actually do than to suggest, but I had to throw it out there as an idea nonetheless.

Usually I just double click a label or other control while in HTML mode and it takes me to the code behind and it's usually updated with the latest control definitions. It doesn't always remove the references to controls that I've since deleted from the HTML.

I ask because once, a long time ago, I was reading a forum or possibally a newsgroup and a Microsoft Rep described their recommended way to have VS.Net (it was 2002 at the time) update the code behind page and at the time I didn't realize the relevance and didn't pay attention. It wasn't the technique I generally use.

I'd just like to know what method others are using and if anyone knows the "officially sanctioned" procedure.

Am I the only one who thinks this website often is slow? Not that I haven't time to wait for the pages to load, but maybe some people will think the radcontrols are slow and/or too heavy. I access the site from Sweden.