Hi,

I have a radgrid that I've configured to use the skin Office 2007, and it looks great.  Now, I've started to configure alternate item background color, and it now returns the following in the screenshot for the alternate rows.

(couldn't paste the screenshot image), but basically, the selected orange row is a missing section at the bottom portion where it used to be orange, but now shows the alternate row background color.

In addition, if I start to apply conditional formatting to a row it wants to use a separate css class rather than the skin css, so for that row, I lose the format of the Office 2007 skin.  I'm doing this thru code.

________________________

Protected Sub rgOutNAbout_ItemDataBound(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As Telerik.Web.UI.GridItemEventArgs) Handles rgOutNAbout.ItemDataBound

'Conditional Formatting DataGrid Row

If (TypeOf e.Item Is Telerik.Web.UI.GridDataItem) Then

Dim dataItem As Telerik.Web.UI.GridDataItem = CType(e.Item,  Telerik.Web.UI.GridDataItem)

If (dataItem("Returning On").Text < DateTime.Now) Then

dataItem.CssClass =

"ReturnDateTime"

End If

End If

End Sub

___________________

Is there a way around this? How can I find which css class the row items are using from the skin?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.

http://www.google.com/ig/directory?hl=en&url=www.justthinkart.com/googlegadgets/aom.xml

Hello,
I found this very useful:

Using CSS to Do Anything: 50+ Creative Examples and Tutorials

Best regards
Mostafa

I've been analyzing traffic trends recently and have noticed that only about 14% of traffic that visits my sites have screen resolutions set to 800X600 or smaller; yet the Telerik.com website stylesheet is set for 779 px wide.

I can possibly concede that the main home page should be compliant with 100% of your visitors specs, but I think that for the majority of your visitors, the Client.net area would hugely benefit from another 200px of available width (or perhaps even a fluid layout).  Specifically, the forums area could use more width allocated for both the left and right hand side of the page.  Most of the Browse Forum root tree nodes are currently truncated and that makes some of them comfusing.  For example, "RadControls for ShareP..." is in there twice.  And there's alot of the forum threads with code samples that are fairly wide and with the hidden overflow a significant amount of the code gets cropped.

Both ComponentArt and Infrangistics websites use the extra width efficiently.

If not webified, perhaps you could add an online aspect to this.

I'd like to offer interactive training.  Watch a video, pause for comments, questions, and answers, then move on to another section.

That would be tres cool!

Thank you.

I often find a couple of "golden nuggets" of information in training/demo materials, and I would like to make a reference to them.

How about the ability to add a bookmark (along with a description) to a training video, and then even store that bookmark as a link, perhaps in "My Favorites".  If not in My Favorites, then perhaps some sort of link that I can paste into OneNote.

Thanks.

Hi,
this is not releated to the telerik controls, but maybe anyone can help:

In ASP.NET, if a linkbutton is disabled, it is rendered without a href, but with the disabled attribute, e.g:

this:

<asp:LinkButton ID="btnTest" runat="server" Text="a disabled LinkButton" Enabled="false"></asp:LinkButton>

produces the following HTML output:
<a id="btnTest" disabled="disabled">a disabled LinkButton</a>

Does anyone know if there's a way to define a style in CSS that only applies to links which are disabled (which have the disabled="disabled" attribute)?

Thanks for any help,
Martin

Hello Everyone,

We have a client which I will not be supporting any longer at my office as per terms of our agreement. She is easy to get along with, and a very well-thoughtout person (so shes not a client who is too difficult to communicate with).

The project is a small CRM which helps them track clients, sites, equipment (currently 2 makes, about 10 models of equipment that they make), service tickets, pre-created reports are also in the program.(very simple ones at that)

This was a high-speed development, which though works pretty well, was what we called a "phase 1". They wanted something, and I gave it to them quickly. I personally don't have the time after hours at work anymore to support the software and further develop on it beyond our initial agreement, and would like to find someone to pick it up from me.

As mentioned, this was a Phase 1. The effort was not in the visuals as per the clients request, but by using RadSplitter, RadPane, RadCombobox, RadWindow, RadGrid, and RadMenu (all classic) I was able to keep a relatively nice and clean look throughout.

Phase 2 will probably include further tracking of clients, additional equipment profiles to be managed (meaning custom forms which hold data for each make, and can be tracked).

It currently is 100% vb.net with a MSSQL 2005 database backend. It contains about a dozen tables, maybe 30 stored procedures, and about 10-15 manually coded queries through the RadGrid or other SqlAdapters.

I will, by email, explain how it was all developed once someone has been hired as the main lead for the project, and explain what the intentions were of each decision made to help make the transition easier.

In Phase 2, some code-rewriting is expected, though this is actually a very simple data insert, data retrieval, data display application with no real complexity in logic, so there is nothing to be scared of.

Turnaround on updates/fixes is not expected at this time to be same day. Though the requests of the client may change in the future. (though like any client, by communicating my time frames, she is usually very happy.)

Anyone who is interested in this, please respond with your email address, or some contact information so that I can email you privately. I will be asking what your per-hour rates are, what your availability for such a project is, and how much experience you have in vb.net, mssql, and the telerik tools.

Also if you have any questions, please feel free to respond, so that I can better answer to anyone whom may be interested.

Thanks!

Just curious as to why asp.net controls for ajax is not an upgrade from asp.net classic.

Hello all,
I was found it useful:
http://effectize.com/23-resources-tuning-your-net-application-performance

Best Regards
Mostafa