This question is locked. New answers and comments are not allowed.
Michael MSTG
Top achievements
Rank 1
Rank 1
Michael MSTG
asked on 23 May 2011, 03:06 PM
I'm trying to understand exactly why the LoadSize property was left out when compared to the WCF RIA DomainDataSource.
With the DDS, we can load up several pages for the user before the next server call. With the RAD DDS, every page does a service call. This seems very expensive and, for the user, can be tedious and slow.
Can someone explain why no LoadSize?
With the DDS, we can load up several pages for the user before the next server call. With the RAD DDS, every page does a service call. This seems very expensive and, for the user, can be tedious and slow.
Can someone explain why no LoadSize?
1 Answer, 1 is accepted
0
Hello Michael MSTG,
Ross
the Telerik team
Unfortunately, the LoadSize feature is the only feature that RadDomainDataSource lacks compared to the stock DomainDataSource.
We have some distant plans for a more complex caching mechanism, but I cannot commit to a specific time frame for its implementation, since it will be shared between different controls (at least that's the idea) and we have not yet fully designed it.
Please, excuse us for the inconvenience.
Ross
the Telerik team
Do you want to have your say when we set our development plans?
Do you want to know when a feature you care about is added or when a bug fixed?
Explore the
Telerik Public Issue Tracking
system and vote to affect the priority of the items