This question is locked. New answers and comments are not allowed.
I posted this issue on another thread:
http://www.telerik.com/community/forums/silverlight/general-discussions/how-to-recompile-radcontrols-for-silverlight-from-source-code.aspx#2035784
====================================================================
Result:
Still throws an error:
I am following: http://www.telerik.com/help/silverlight/protecting-telerik-radcontrols-assembly.html
I am using this for Silverlight 4 and am using source with version: 2011.3.1220
I have been following the instructions. Don't know what I am doing wrong. Could you please reply to this thread asap as it is really close to deployment date.
=============================================================
I wasn't sure whether is was still being monitored as it was marked as answered. Hence my deparate attempt to start a new thread to get attention.
Any help is appreciated.
http://www.telerik.com/community/forums/silverlight/general-discussions/how-to-recompile-radcontrols-for-silverlight-from-source-code.aspx#2035784
====================================================================
- I installed StyleCop 4.6
- Ran Build_SL.bat and it was a success this time.
- Copied the new binaries from Binaries/Silverlight folder to: C:\Program Files\Telerik\RadControls for Silverlight Q3. 2011\Binaries\Protected\Silverlight
- Updated the references in the Silverlight project to reflect new binaries. (Version = 2011.3.1520.1040)
- Added the Resource string in App.xaml with the application name
Result:
Still throws an error:
- This version of Telerik RadControls for Silverlight is licensed only for use by AppName
I am following: http://www.telerik.com/help/silverlight/protecting-telerik-radcontrols-assembly.html
I am using this for Silverlight 4 and am using source with version: 2011.3.1220
I have been following the instructions. Don't know what I am doing wrong. Could you please reply to this thread asap as it is really close to deployment date.
=============================================================
I wasn't sure whether is was still being monitored as it was marked as answered. Hence my deparate attempt to start a new thread to get attention.
Any help is appreciated.