This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.

GridViewDataColumn.IsVisible

59 Answers 1313 Views

GridView

This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.

This question is locked. New answers and comments are not allowed.

59 Answers, 1 is accepted

answered on 25 Jun 2010, 10:54 PM

You can use this mechanism. In your ViewModel you would set ColumnsToHide to a string containing columns names separated by a comma.

    
            using System.Windows; 
        
            namespace Helpers 
        
            { 
        
                public class ColumnHiderBinder 
        
                { 
        
                    public static readonly DependencyProperty ColumnListProperty = 
        
                        DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("ColumnList", typeof(string), 
        
                        typeof(string), new PropertyMetadata(OnColumnListChanged)); 
        
                    public static string GetColumnList(DependencyObject d) 
        
                    { 
        
                        return (string)d.GetValue(ColumnListProperty); 
        
                    }         
        
                    public static void SetColumnList(DependencyObject d, string value) 
        
                    { 
        
                        d.SetValue(ColumnListProperty, value); 
        
                    }          
        
                    private static void OnColumnListChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e) 
        
                    { 
        
                        if (!(d is RadGridView)) return; 
        
                        var obj = ((RadGridView) d); 
        
                        foreach (var item in ((string) e.NewValue).Split(new [] {','})) 
        
                        { 
        
                            obj.Columns[item].IsVisible = false; 
        
                        } 
        
                    } 
        
                } 
        
            }

And then in your XAML:

    
            <RadGridView  Helpers:ColumnHiderBinder.ColumnList="{Binding ColumnsToHide}" >

answered on 30 Jun 2010, 11:21 AM

Hello Vlad,
I am currently trying out your WPF RadGrid control, and first of all I really have to say great job to you all. It's a really good product compared to all the others out there.
However, I couldn't help it to notice your statement about DataBinding on DependencyObjects and I really cannot figure it out. Could you please be so kind as to helping me out on this one.
First lets look at this post by Mr. Nikolay Atanasov. In it, Telerik proudly announces native Silverlight 4 support of it's controls. In the product list provided, there is your RadControls suit for SL4 (it's the last one with the red rectangle around it). The post is dated to March 18, 2010. Your own post, in which you say that there is no DataBinding on DependencyObjects is dated to March 16, 2010. I am guessing that 2 days is not such a long time to turn things around so dramatically. Having said that, I am guessing that you probably had native support for SL4 long before the announcement day on March 18 (please correct me if I'm wrong).
By now your statement has been that your RadControls have native support for SL4, and that DataBinding is not possible on DependencyObjects. To be honest I'm really confused here. A long time ago I've read this post by Mr. Shawn Wildermuth about some of the changes in SL4. As he says, DataBinding is actually now available on DependencyObjects. When I read your post Vlad, I sat down and opened Visual Studio. Started out a new project and as it turns out, in SL4 the Binding has really moved out to the DependencyObject contrary to SL3 in which it really was in the FrameworkElement.
My question would be as follows: How can you say your RadControls have native SL4 support, when you guys don't even know the difference between SL3 and SL4?

answered on 30 Aug 2010, 10:03 AM

bindingtoisvisible.zip

Hi Jaroslav Půbal,

You can easily use a Binding to the IsVisible property of the column. I am sending you a sample project illustrating that functionality. Following the scenario in the sample application, once you check the CheckBox in the bottom, the visibility of the second column will be changed.
I hope that helps.

Sincerely yours,
Maya
the Telerik team

Do you want to have your say when we set our development plans? Do you want to know when a feature you care about is added or when a bug fixed? Explore the Telerik Public Issue Tracking system and vote to affect the priority of the items

answered on 31 Aug 2010, 10:31 AM

Hi Maya,
I finally figured out why column visibility does not work and how to simulate.
Dont know if it Telerik or SL4 bug.

Based on your attachment I change in MainPage.xaml two lines.

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn IsVisible="{Binding IsChecked, ElementName=CheckBox1}" ...

Now I expected that after application start CheckBox is unchecked and column is invisible. But column is visible.
When checking and unchecking I expect column is hiding and showing. But nothing happens unless I select column with mouse.

MainPage.xaml

<UserControl x:Class="BindingToIsVisible.MainPage"

xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"

xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"

xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"

xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"

xmlns:telerik="http://schemas.telerik.com/2008/xaml/presentation"

xmlns:my="clr-namespace:BindingToIsVisible"

mc:Ignorable="d" d:DesignHeight="700" d:DesignWidth="700">

<UserControl.Resources>

<my:MyViewModel x:Key="MyViewModel"/>

</UserControl.Resources>

<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot"

Background="White"

DataContext="{StaticResource MyViewModel}">

<Grid.RowDefinitions>

<RowDefinition Height="*"/>

<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />

</Grid.RowDefinitions>

<telerik:RadGridView Grid.Row="0"

Name="clubsGrid"

ItemsSource="{Binding Clubs}"

AutoGenerateColumns="False"

Margin="5">

<telerik:RadGridView.Columns>

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn DataMemberBinding="{Binding Name}"/>

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn DataMemberBinding="{Binding Established}"

Header="Est."

IsVisible="{Binding IsChecked, ElementName=CheckBox1}"

DataFormatString="{}{0:yyyy}"/>

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn DataMemberBinding="{Binding StadiumCapacity}"

Header="Stadium"

DataFormatString="{}{0:N0}"/>

</telerik:RadGridView.Columns>

</telerik:RadGridView>

<StackPanel Grid.Row="1" Orientation="Horizontal">

<TextBox Text="Click here to hide the last column" />

<CheckBox x:Name="CheckBox1" />

</StackPanel>

</Grid>

</UserControl>

answered on 07 Sep 2010, 02:16 PM

bindingtoisvisible-settingsourceproperty.zip

Hello Jaroslav Půbal,

On examining your requirements, another - and probably the most appropriate solution for that case - came up. What needs to be done here is to set the "Source" Property on defining the Binding of the IsVisible Property of the column. Thus once you set your ViewModel as a Resource, you will be able to use it afterwards like follows:

<UserControl.Resources>

<my:MyViewModel x:Key="MyViewModel"/>

</UserControl.Resources>

<telerik:RadGridView.Columns

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn DataMemberBinding="{Binding Name}"

/>

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn DataMemberBinding="{Binding Established}"

Header="Est."
IsVisible="{Binding IsColumnVisible, Source={StaticResource MyViewModel}}"

DataFormatString="{}{0:yyyy}"/>

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn DataMemberBinding="{Binding StadiumCapacity}"

Header="Stadium"
IsVisible="{Binding IsColumnVisible, Source={StaticResource MyViewModel}}"

DataFormatString="{}{0:N0}"

/>

</telerik:RadGridView.Columns>

<CheckBox x:Name="CheckBox1"
IsChecked="{Binding IsColumnVisible, Source={StaticResource MyViewModel}, Mode=TwoWay}"/>

Where "IsColumnVisible" is a property defined in the ViewModel.
Thus both columns as well as the CheckBox are aware where exactly to find that property - the MyViewModel.
I am sending you a sample project illustrating the proposed solution.

Regards,
Maya
the Telerik team

answered on 14 Oct 2010, 04:06 PM

The parent page has it's datacontext to a viewmodel that is set by a viewmodellocator. Therefore, it is not a static resource. The grid on the page does not have a datacontext, so therefore any data bindings on grid (and gridviewcolumn) properties should be bound to the view model on page.datacontext.

Yet when i setup a binding on IsVisible, the property is not honored *until i click within a cell of that column*. At that point, the databinding starts behaving normally. This tells me two things:

1. my binding is bound to the correct viewmodel property, because after clicking in the cell, it works as expected.
2. this is not the elementname problem you speak of, because I am not using it here at all.

--Sam

answered on 05 Nov 2010, 12:05 AM

Try making the binding Two way:

IsVisible="{Binding Path=DataContext.ShowPercentageColumn, ElementName=LayoutRoot, Mode=TwoWay}"

This should fix the problem.

If you don't have any binding Mode Like :

IsVisible="{Binding Path=DataContext.ShowPercentageColumn, ElementName=LayoutRoot}"

then it will use the default binding mode for that property, I assume that IsVisible's default binding mode is OneWay, which is why it is not working for that scenario either.

If you want to programatically change the value of a bound value and have the UI update itself automatically (without any user interaction on the UI), then you need to make the Mode=TwoWay.

Hope this helps.

answered on 08 Nov 2010, 05:43 PM

bindingtoisvisible-usercontrol.zip

Hello kulashaker,

Using the ElementName binding is not as reliable as expected and unfortunately it does not always provide the desired result. One possible approach would be to define a Resource and use it as a StaticResource in the Binding as demonstrated above.
Another technique is to wrap the RadGridView in a custom UserControls that exposes a property responsible for the column's visibility. I am sending you a sample project illustrating the proposed solution.

Kind regards,
Maya
the Telerik team

answered on 04 Jan 2011, 03:58 PM

I have the same problem as Sam, was this ever resolved ?.

Basically I am binding to a viewmodel, on that viewmodel is a bool property which i bind to IsVisible property on the GridViewDataColumn.
This bool property can change, depending on what mode the grid is in, and hence columns should hide/show depending on this.
When the datagrid is first shown, the binding is not initiated and only gets initiated when I click in the column.
I know this because I can change the binding to an incorrect property and I get a binding error in debug output (only when i click in the column), if I don't click in the column, i get no binding error, which tells me that the binding is not getting initialized until you click in the column.

Is there any solution to this ?
I want columns to be hidden/shown on first entry, clicking in the column to fire bindings is just ..... well ....wrong.

Many thanks

Dave

answered on 19 Jan 2011, 11:04 PM

Same problem here. I have a viewmodel that is the datacontext for the UserControl that the RadGridView is located in, and a bool property for each column. In the XAML, the IsVisible property on each of these columns is bound to the aforementioned properties in the viewmodel.

I have also noticed that clicking the cells seems to "activate" the binding, and after that point the column shows or hides appropriately based on the value of the property.

This seems like a bug to me. We were using the Microsoft DataGrid which didn't allow binding the Visibility property, so I was hoping that when we made the change to use the RadGridView, we would no longer have to set it programmatically.

Thanks,
Geoff

answered on 15 Mar 2011, 10:29 AM

Hi Terry Foster,

Columns in RadGridView for Silverlight are plain dependency objects rather than visual elements. Altering the behavior of RadGridView so that such bindings become possible would inevitably introduce a lot of breaking changes and inconsistent behavior with previous versions making upgrades to newer versions a pain for lots of our customers. This is the reason we recommend the solutions / workarounds mentioned before.

Regards,
Pavel Pavlov
the Telerik team

Registration for Q1 2011 What’s New Webinar Week is now open. Mark your calendar for the week starting March 21st and book your seat for a walk through all the exciting stuff we ship with the new release!

answered on 17 Mar 2011, 08:41 PM

I'm currently using the 2010Q3 Silverlight controls. The following workaround worked for me:

        private void RadGridView_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
        {
            var gridView = (GridViewDataControl)sender;
 
            var originalCurrentColumn = gridView.CurrentColumn;
            foreach (var column in gridView.Columns)
                gridView.CurrentColumn = column;
            gridView.CurrentColumn = originalCurrentColumn;
        }

It does seem that Telerik could make this happen by default, if they haven't already fixed it in the latest version.

answered on 22 May 2011, 08:20 PM

We had a similar problem the RadTreeListView (based on the RadGridView) when binding a column's GridViewDataColumn.IsVisible to a property in the ViewModel. A workaround was to create a subclass of the RadTreeListView, add a dependency property that in turn was bound to the ViewModel's property, and use the dependency property's property change callback to programmatically update the column's IsVisible property.

BTW, setting a column's IsVisible to False within the xaml to initially hide the column was not working correctly. So we had to remove this from the xaml and programmatically set the IsVisible value to false within an override of OnApplyTemplate in the treeview subclass.

Combining the two is working great for us.

public class CustomTreeListView : RadTreeListView

{

public CustomTreeListView() : base()

{

}

#region DTDColumnVisible Dependency Property

/// <summary>

/// Dependency property used for changing the DTDColumn visibility. Binding directly to GridViewDataColumn.IsVisible

/// property does not work. Workaround.

/// </summary>

public bool DTDColumnVisible

{

get { return (bool)this.GetValue(DTDColumnVisibleProperty); }

set { SetValue(DTDColumnVisibleProperty, value); }

}

public static readonly DependencyProperty DTDColumnVisibleProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(

"DTDColumnVisible", typeof(bool), typeof(CustomTreeListView), new PropertyMetadata(false, new PropertyChangedCallback(OnDTDColumnVisibleChanged)));

private static void OnDTDColumnVisibleChanged(DependencyObject obj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs args)

{

// Update the DTDColumn visibility

CustomTreeListView treelistview = obj as CustomTreeListView;

if (treelistview != null)

treelistview.Columns["DTDColumn"].IsVisible = (bool)args.NewValue;

}

#endregion DTDColumnVisible Dependency Property

public override void OnApplyTemplate()

{

base.OnApplyTemplate();

this.Columns["DTDColumn"].IsVisible = false;

}

answered on 21 Jun 2011, 12:00 PM

I'm struggling with this too but I'm creating my columns programmatically and the bindings too.

I have the latest controls and it doesn't seem to be picking up the bindings for IsVisibleProperty, IsReadOnlyProperty or HeaderProperty at all. I've tried hooking into the Loaded event like John suggested but it doesn't seem to make a difference. I'm using BindingOperations.SetBinding() to set the bindings on the GridViewDataColumn instance.

I've noticed that there is an IsReadOnlyBinding which I can work with but I still need to be able to bind the visibility and header to my viewmodel. If it's just not possible I'll probably do something the the MVVM Lite messaging framework.

answered on 24 Feb 2012, 04:31 PM

Hi Juliana,

Here's what worked for me. The xaml binding is ignored, so I set bindings in the Loaded event for the page the grid is in. In my view model (based on INotifyPropertyChanged, naturally), I have one boolean property for each column in the grid, and the names of these properties correspond to the UniqueName fields for each column, for example, IsCol1Visible, IsCol2Visible, etc.

In the loaded event I set the bindings like this:

Binding b;

foreach (GridViewBoundColumnBase c in grid.Columns)

{

b = new Binding(string.Format("Is{0}Visible", c.UniqueName));

b.Mode = BindingMode.TwoWay;

b.Source = View;

BindingOperations.SetBinding(c, GridViewDataColumn.IsVisibleProperty, b);

}

I don't know if this is a good way, or if there is a better way, but this certainly works. Hope that helps!

Kelly

answered on 04 May 2012, 07:42 AM

Hi. I am currently using IsVisible property bound to a property of my view model.

1.) Create a DataContextProxy class, as in :
http://forums.silverlight.net/post/539919.aspx

i have used this proxy class in SL4 and SL5 and it works pretty well when using mvvm.

2.) Add a resource to your user control:
<myns:DataContextProxy x:Key="DCProxy/>

3.) Bind the IsVisible property to a property of your view model:

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn
Width="120"
DataMemberBinding="{Binding MyAdress, Mode=TwoWay}"
IsVisible="{Binding DataSource.IsMyAddressVisible, Source={StaticResource DCProxy}}">

4.) Remeber to call PropertyChanged when IsMyAddressVisible changes its value in your view model.

Hope it helps,

Guillermo

answered on 12 Nov 2012, 10:55 AM

Hello, i have a problem with RadGridView. In my GridViewDataColumn, i cant use DataMemberBinding for binding with a another element (textbox1). The column TEST is always null.

<TextBox Height="23" Name="textBox1" Width="120" Text="test" />

<telerik:RadGridView x:Name="dgrDetailsFacture"

ItemsSource="{Binding ElementName=dgrFacture,Path=SelectedItem.GrpLigneFacture}"

IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem="true"

CanUserResizeColumns="False" >

<telerik:RadGridView.Columns>

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn

TextAlignment="Center" IsReadOnly="True"

DataMemberBinding="{Binding CodeArti, Mode=OneWay}"

Header="Article" HeaderTextAlignment="Center" Width="90" UniqueName="article"/>

<telerik:GridViewDataColumn

TextAlignment="Left" IsReadOnly="True"

DataMemberBinding="{Binding Mode=OneWay, ElementName=textBox1, Path=Text}"

Header="TEST" HeaderTextAlignment="Center" Width="*" />

</telerik:RadGridView.Columns>

</telerik:RadGridView>

answered on 23 Jan 2015, 02:47 PM

This is poor. IsVisible on GridViewColumn is a dependency property, therefore it should be bindable. If a breakpoint is added to the binding in the XAML, then you can see that initially the datacontext is correct, but subsequently it gets set to something else and the binding evaluates to null which makes the column visible. At the least you should be able to navigate to the IsVisible property in the object explorer and see a comment explaining that it cannot be used for binding.

In my case I have the grid in a user control which exposes a dependency property that that view model can bind to. The workaround of John's with the loaded event did not work, but changing the binding to:

IsVisible="{Binding ShowShare, ElementName=root}"

where root is the name of the UserControl element in the XAML works.

answered on 06 Mar 2015, 01:05 AM

UPDATE: I did try Maya sample project (bindingtoisvisible.zip) ... it does work BUT it's really only practical for demonstration purposes.

A production application would never instantiate the VM that way -- just not flexible ... I would expect (at least ours) production applications to setup the DataContext in a New instance of the UserControl passing whatever parameters are needed.

I was able to setup a checkbox that binds to IsVisible on a column but again that's user interaction which is not MVVM where I need to setup the IsVisible on the columns based on some parameter/state.

So at this point we've hit a rather significant show stopper unless this is implemented. Being able to hide columns in a grid using MVVM is key for our requirements.

Does anyone have any suggestions of alternate vendors that might provide such functionality in their Grids?

Cheers, Rob.

answered on 07 Nov 2017, 02:54 PM

VisibilityBinding.zip

Hello,

Can you check out the attached project where the Position column's IsVisible property in the nested grid is bound to a property in the Model? Please give this a try and let me know if that works for you. If you need further assistance, may I ask you to provide some more information about your scenario and perhaps a sample project.

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
Vladimir Stoyanov
Progress Telerik

Try our brand new, jQuery-free Angular 2 components built from ground-up which deliver the business app essential building blocks - a grid component, data visualization (charts) and form elements.