This question is locked. New answers and comments are not allowed.
Hi
We're implementing a persistent audit trail that has an 'audit' class alongside each domain (business) class. I'd like to make the audit class an inner class of the domain one, but I can't find a way to set up the OpenAccess (mapping) configuration for an inner class (using the namespace and class elements). Is it possible? (Not a problem if it isn't).
Thanks, Peter
We're implementing a persistent audit trail that has an 'audit' class alongside each domain (business) class. I'd like to make the audit class an inner class of the domain one, but I can't find a way to set up the OpenAccess (mapping) configuration for an inner class (using the namespace and class elements). Is it possible? (Not a problem if it isn't).
Thanks, Peter
4 Answers, 1 is accepted
0
Hello Peter,
I am afraid this is not fully supported by the wizards but there is a chance to get it working by editing the mapping configuration manually. Could you please tell us which approach you are using - forward or reverse mapping, so we can test if it is possible and provide you with the steps to achieve it?
Regards,
Alexander
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions on the new Telerik Support Portal.
Watch a video on how to optimize your support resource searches and check out more tips on the blogs.
I am afraid this is not fully supported by the wizards but there is a chance to get it working by editing the mapping configuration manually. Could you please tell us which approach you are using - forward or reverse mapping, so we can test if it is possible and provide you with the steps to achieve it?
Regards,
Alexander
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions on the new Telerik Support Portal.
Watch a video on how to optimize your support resource searches and check out more tips on the blogs.
0
Peter
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 25 Nov 2009, 11:10 AM
Hello Alexander
We're using forward mapping (actually we generate the mapping configuration - and the persistent classes etc - from our domain specific language), so no problem with manually setting up the configuration.
Regards, Peter
We're using forward mapping (actually we generate the mapping configuration - and the persistent classes etc - from our domain specific language), so no problem with manually setting up the configuration.
Regards, Peter
0
Accepted
Hi Peter,
I tested this scenario and it seems to be working fine. The configuration of the nested class is done the same way as the configuration of the outer class. The tricky part though is that in the mapping the name of the nested class is set by concatenating the two class names with a plus (+) sign. For example, if you have ClassA and ClassB (ClassB is nested in ClassA), the mapping would look like this:
The limitation is that the settings for ClassB are not available in the Forward mapping wizard and should be manually added. Please find my test project attached and let us know if you face any difficulties.
Sincerely yours,
Alexander
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions on the new Telerik Support Portal.
Watch a video on how to optimize your support resource searches and check out more tips on the blogs.
I tested this scenario and it seems to be working fine. The configuration of the nested class is done the same way as the configuration of the outer class. The tricky part though is that in the mapping the name of the nested class is set by concatenating the two class names with a plus (+) sign. For example, if you have ClassA and ClassB (ClassB is nested in ClassA), the mapping would look like this:
<
mapping
id
=
"mssqlMapping"
>
<
namespace
name
=
"ConsoleApplication1"
>
<
class
name
=
"ClassA+ClassB"
>
<
extension
key
=
"db-table-name"
value
=
"ClassB"
/>
<!-- manually added -->
<
field
name
=
"text"
>
<
extension
key
=
"db-column"
>
<
extension
key
=
"db-column-name"
value
=
"Text"
/>
</
extension
>
</
field
>
<!-- end -->
</
class
>
<
class
name
=
"ClassA"
>
<
extension
key
=
"db-table-name"
value
=
"ClassA"
/>
<
field
name
=
"number"
>
<
extension
key
=
"db-column"
>
<
extension
key
=
"db-column-name"
value
=
"Number"
/>
</
extension
>
</
field
>
</
class
>
</
namespace
>
</
mapping
>
The limitation is that the settings for ClassB are not available in the Forward mapping wizard and should be manually added. Please find my test project attached and let us know if you face any difficulties.
Sincerely yours,
Alexander
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions on the new Telerik Support Portal.
Watch a video on how to optimize your support resource searches and check out more tips on the blogs.
0
Peter
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 25 Nov 2009, 06:41 PM
Thank you Alexander - the '+' bit was what I was missing (I couldn't find it the documentation, so you might want to add it for the next update).
Regards, Peter
Regards, Peter