This question is locked. New answers and comments are not allowed.
I am seeking some clarifications on the way analytics is priced.. what does 100 concurrent devices means? does this represents that I can get stats for a maximum of 100 devices with the base subscription? Comparing this with other big names like flurry and google analytics this seems like I have a wrong understanding on this one. Please clarify
2 Answers, 1 is accepted
0
Hi Muhammad,
Could you please give us a link to the page containing the "concurrent devices" text?
We have identified this wording to be quite confusing and changed it with "unique active devices per month". This means the if you have 10K customer and only 100 or less are active every month you should be OK. Every month the unique devices counter is reset.
You could take a look at the current pricing page here: https://www.telerik.com/purchase/analytics
Regards,
Hristo
Telerik
Could you please give us a link to the page containing the "concurrent devices" text?
We have identified this wording to be quite confusing and changed it with "unique active devices per month". This means the if you have 10K customer and only 100 or less are active every month you should be OK. Every month the unique devices counter is reset.
You could take a look at the current pricing page here: https://www.telerik.com/purchase/analytics
Regards,
Hristo
Telerik
EQATEC Application Analytics is now Telerik Analytics. For more information on the new name, plus what's new in Telerik Analytics, please, check out the Analytics Service Announcement.
0
joffery
Top achievements
Rank 1
Rank 1
answered on 04 Aug 2015, 06:12 AM
marketing speaks in terms of transactions a day or even unique customers
on the site, the only measurement useful for capacity planning is how
many people were on the website at the same time, the instantaneous
peak. By “on the website”, I mean looking at their browsers at a page on
the website, regardless of whether that customer is reading or
clicking. It’s tempting to use hits/sec or transactions/sec, which are
fine metrics, but what happens when you redesign the site for higher
performance and the number of hits/sec or transactions/sec drops as a
result? The capacity of the site may have gone up, but the number of
hits/sec would drop. In the end you need a metric that is implementation
independent.
on the site, the only measurement useful for capacity planning is how
many people were on the website at the same time, the instantaneous
peak. By “on the website”, I mean looking at their browsers at a page on
the website, regardless of whether that customer is reading or
clicking. It’s tempting to use hits/sec or transactions/sec, which are
fine metrics, but what happens when you redesign the site for higher
performance and the number of hits/sec or transactions/sec drops as a
result? The capacity of the site may have gone up, but the number of
hits/sec would drop. In the end you need a metric that is implementation
independent.