Fiddler Everywhere 5.21.0 "Fiddler.WebUi is tampered" error on Fedora 41, works on Fedora 37.

1 Answer 44 Views
Fiddler Everywhere Linux
Ivor
Top achievements
Rank 1
Ivor asked on 24 Nov 2024, 05:46 PM

fiddler-everywhere-5.21.0.AppImage runs successfully on a Fedora 37 workstation. On a Fedora 41 workstation it throws a System.TypeInitializationException and reports " Fiddler.WebUi is tampered" and fails to start the server.:

09:08:37.489 › Trying to start server at port [16197].
09:08:37.617 › Server error log during start: Unhandled exception. 
09:08:37.632 › Server error log during start: System.TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for '<Module>' threw an exception.
 ---> System.Exception: Fiddler.WebUi is tampered.
   at MaoFcf2Vq4taIANM6n.hIDAYxH6DWLHIthQgC.zSLipEDdx()
   at .cctor()
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---

The checksum on the AppImage file is the same on both FC37 and FC41 workstations. It fails on a clean FC41 installation as well as on another system that was upgraded from FC38 to FC41. Full "script" log attached. Am I missing some preparation or is this a bug?

1 Answer, 1 is accepted

Sort by
0
Nick Iliev
Telerik team
answered on 25 Nov 2024, 11:48 AM

Hello Ivor,

 

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention and for providing the technical details and logs. I can confirm that we were able to fully reproduce the behavior while using Fedora 41 Workstation. We have logged it as a bug in the following public GitHub thread, which you can use as a reference: https://github.com/telerik/fiddler-everywhere/issues/51. 

 

We will update the linked thread as soon as we have more information about potential solutions or upcoming fixes.

 

Regards,
Nick Iliev
Progress Telerik

Love the Telerik and Kendo UI products and believe more people should try them? Invite a fellow developer to become a Progress customer and each of you can get a $50 Amazon gift voucher.

Tags
Fiddler Everywhere Linux
Asked by
Ivor
Top achievements
Rank 1
Answers by
Nick Iliev
Telerik team
Share this question
or