Reverse mapping and GiST in PGSQL

[Laurent Fabre]

Hi,

It seems no matter how you use custom GiST columns and even if you separate the schema the mapper will choke on the indexes and column types for as long as the data to be mapped and the GiST definition reside in the same database.

So I guess I'll have to find another way....

LF

[Damyan Bogoev]

Hi Laurent Fabre,

Firstly I want to thank you for the valuable input.
We will investigate the reported problem on our side. Once we resolve it we will provide you with more details.
I am sorry for the inconvenience caused.

Best wishes,
Damyan Bogoev
the Telerik team

[Laurent Fabre]

As I cannot avoid using GiST I found a way to go around it for now which is that I duplicated the database. I opt out the GiST part on one which I use for reverse mapping and the Telerik runtime doesn't seem to have any issues operating on the other one once the mapping is passed.

This is a problem if for example I would like to be able to mapped the table in question where the GiST column is present which for now I'll update using mapped stored procedure and such.

LF

[Damyan Bogoev]

Hi Laurent Fabre,

It seems to be an issue related to the schema reading of GiST indexes. We will fix the cause for this issue for the next Q1 release.
Your telerik points are updated.

All the best,
Damyan Bogoev
the Telerik team