This question is locked. New answers and comments are not allowed.
Hi,
I have been seeing issues which seem to have been addressed in a few forum posts but as of yet there are no definitive answers.
This is primarily in regards to the virtualization seen with the RadDataBoundListBox, and getting an OutOfMemoryException, primarily in regards to examples where either a wrap virtualization strategy is applied or there are 50+ images involved.
I have replicated the Telerik example for RadDataBoundListBox for the OnDemand scenario. However, with the wrap virtualization and trying to have a control which can shows 50+ images, I always reach an OutOfMemoryException.
My items source is that of an ObservableCollection, as used in the example.
My item template is simply an Image with its source binding to the uri string of a given image (the thumbnail in this case).
I have a DataVirtualizationItemTemplate with a simple 'get more' functionality, similar to what is shown in the Telerik example once more.
Is there any reason why I would be getting this?
Many Thanks,
Mike
I have been seeing issues which seem to have been addressed in a few forum posts but as of yet there are no definitive answers.
This is primarily in regards to the virtualization seen with the RadDataBoundListBox, and getting an OutOfMemoryException, primarily in regards to examples where either a wrap virtualization strategy is applied or there are 50+ images involved.
I have replicated the Telerik example for RadDataBoundListBox for the OnDemand scenario. However, with the wrap virtualization and trying to have a control which can shows 50+ images, I always reach an OutOfMemoryException.
My items source is that of an ObservableCollection, as used in the example.
My item template is simply an Image with its source binding to the uri string of a given image (the thumbnail in this case).
I have a DataVirtualizationItemTemplate with a simple 'get more' functionality, similar to what is shown in the Telerik example once more.
Is there any reason why I would be getting this?
Many Thanks,
Mike