Use FiddlerCore as a forward proxy to replace Squid

3 posts, 1 answers
  1. Shloma
    Shloma avatar
    3 posts
    Member since:
    Oct 2012

    Posted 08 Apr 2015 Link to this post

    Hi,

    Does it make sense, and has it been used in the past, to use FiddlerCore as a forward proxy instead of using a Squid on Linux. 

    The primary reason for this would be lack of knowledge (and talent pool on C++ and Linux), and some other limitations with the Squid server. 

    Basically I would like to know if FiddlerCore has been designed to handle the load in production environment where 1000's of people will connect and use the proxy server primarily for content filtering and manipulation. 

    Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. 

    Regards,

    Shloma

  2. Answer
    Eric Lawrence
    Admin
    Eric Lawrence avatar
    833 posts

    Posted 09 Apr 2015 Link to this post

    Hello, Shloma--

    Your best bet would be to try it out, but generally speaking, FiddlerCore is not designed to be used as a general purpose shared proxy server for thousands of users. There are techniques you can use to improve its scalability (e.g. streaming requests and responses, not storing traffic in memory longer than needed, etc) but I would expect that Squid and related products are better suited for high-load scenarios.

    Regards,
    Eric Lawrence
    Telerik
     

    See What's Next in App Development. Register for TelerikNEXT.

     
  3. Shloma
    Shloma avatar
    3 posts
    Member since:
    Oct 2012

    Posted 12 Apr 2015 in reply to Eric Lawrence Link to this post

    Thanks for the truthful and honest response, Eric!
Back to Top