5 Answers, 1 is accepted
0
Hello Brian,
We recommend using RadDock. To encourage this practice, we have replaced the external edit in RadWindow demo with external edit in RadDock.
Greetings, Peter
the Telerik team
We recommend using RadDock. To encourage this practice, we have replaced the external edit in RadWindow demo with external edit in RadDock.
Greetings, Peter
the Telerik team
Browse the vast support resources we have to jump start your development with RadControls for ASP.NET AJAX. See how to integrate our AJAX controls seamlessly in SharePoint 2007/2010 visiting our common SharePoint portal
0
Stuart Hemming
Top achievements
Rank 2
Rank 2
answered on 19 Sep 2011, 12:23 PM
Sorry to hijack the thread, but can I ask why you suggest using RadDock over RadWindow?
--
Stuart
--
Stuart
0
Hello Stuart,
It seems a simpler implementation using RadDock which provides a more stable solution. Of course using RadWindow is also an option.
Kind regards,
Peter
the Telerik team
It seems a simpler implementation using RadDock which provides a more stable solution. Of course using RadWindow is also an option.
Kind regards,
Peter
the Telerik team
Browse the vast support resources we have to jump start your development with RadControls for ASP.NET AJAX. See how to integrate our AJAX controls seamlessly in SharePoint 2007/2010 visiting our common SharePoint portal
0
Brian
Top achievements
Rank 2
Rank 2
answered on 21 Sep 2011, 03:57 PM
In some regards, it is easier to use RadDock but I have noticed a performance issue regarding the Viewstate - it is very big using RadDock compared to a solution with RadWindowManager.
Brian
Brian
0
Stuart Hemming
Top achievements
Rank 2
Rank 2
answered on 21 Sep 2011, 05:00 PM
FWIW, I have a fairly complex solution using RadWindow but it doesn't use anything associated with the Advanced Template; it's completely standalone.
--
Stuart
--
Stuart