Thanks for the quick response Erjan.
Considering the vision for LightSwitch, I would anticipate a need for editor (controls) and theme extensibility. LightSwitch isn't even out in beta yet (due August 23rd), so from a needs perspective it is tough to try and give you some specifics.
From a business perspective, if we can do more in less time, then the return is obvious. LightSwitch is apparently going to help us do that. So if you talk about usage scenarios, I would suggest that the value of Telerik extensions for LightSwitch would include;
- Telerik Project Type Templates - using Telerik forms and controls.
- Telerik UI Control Extensions - creating new "Telerik" centric screens, or modifying existing LightSwitch generated screens, to use Telerik user controls.
- OpenAccess ORM Extension - extend the existing LightSwitch data designers to use the OpenAccess ORM.
I am following LightSwitch closely because I believe it will have a relativly large impact the development and business community.
LightSwitch claims to make it easier for developers to create line of business applications quickly. No, it is not necessarily an tool you want to use to create a large enterprise class solution, but LightSwitch should take care of development efforts for a relatively larger number of LOB apps needed in the future.
How many developers out there have been challenged with supporting an Access application created by people with little or no experience? How many organizations have small IT shops where quick one-off Access type applications are deployed only to find the application growing organically - and then becoming really expensive to support and maintain. I've been there and done that.
Eitherway you look at it, LightSwitch will have an impact and I want to be prepared with the tools that will help me build solutions that are attractive, usable, and provide value to my customers. I use Telerik tools for that now. When LightSwitch comes out and it allows me to create LOB applications faster than using just Visual Studio and Telerik, then I am going to invest in it and use it. If using Visual Studio LightSwitch with Telerik helps me create LOB applications just as fast; then great because I can then go beyond creating a solution that solves a business problem - I can create a solution that looks great too.
For what it is worth, I have been blogging about LightSwitch at
http://blog.SelectSystems.ca. Feel free to keep up with the entires because I am going to be following LightSwitch very closely.
Also of note; it was either at the VSLive keynote (
video here) or maybe it was the
MSDN Channel9 video, I can't remember, where someone mentioned that Microsoft was working with Infragistics on this LightSwitch. I still prefer Telerik though ;)
Thanks for listening,
Paul