In the previous post we discussed a host of different things to introduce everyone to the LOB Chronicles project as well as the technologies (both Microsoft and Telerik) that are involved. With a combination of Silverlight, TeamPulse (build with the Telerik Xaml tools), RadControls for Silverlight, OpenAccess, and Test Studio, we’re ready to start planning out our application from the ground up. Before we write code, though, we want to take a step back and consider just who we’re designing this software for - which is where our UX experts come into play.
This is a great question and one which many people (myself included) don’t entirely understand. Thankfully I’m working with two folks who excel with UX practices and theory, so I have been able to seriously improve my understanding of this process. To paraphrase from the recent lesson on UX that I received, UX isn’t about the design of software (although UX recommendations will lead to design choices) but instead concerned with identifying the most high-traffic areas of the application and to devise “a navigation model that will allow the user to both intuitively and quickly reach their destination and perform the actions they have in mind” (quoting one of our UX masters, Kalin).
In looking at John the sales person, we have to examine his primary concern and the goal he is essentially constantly working towards - ‘How do I meet my quota?’ With this in mind, our exploration into UX will dive into the considerations around this one driving goal and how it impacts the daily workflow of a sales person, what concerns he might have around reaching the quota, what information we need to surface quickly and easily to help achieve this goal, and when all is said and done to ensure the software that we are developing here helps, rather than hinders, him achieving this goal. After all, how many times have you blamed bad software (whether it was legitimate or not :D) for having a bad day at work or losing a deal because XYZ screen keeps crashing and you can’t access certain information?
Empathizing With the End User
If we were to put all of the concerns that John has into a diagram, it might look something like the following:
Diving a little further into the nodes here (since there is a lot of information), we know that John is experiencing some of the following…
So now John thinks:
Now John is feeling:
Meaning his response to his boss/the team is that John needs to:
All leading to John spending more time on:
Turning Empathy into Requirements
As we all know very well, all software has very black and white requirements for what needs to be involved (I need an entry screen, some way to view and browse records, etc.), but by performing this type of UX analysis we can better understand what drives the user and therefore paint those requirements into software that will help the user to accomplish his goals in a much more productive manner.
If we take a closer look at the analysis that we did above, a few key points can be extracted which will help us move onto the next stage of development – working on a UI/navigation model to begin development around. A few key items we might want to include based on our diagram above are:
The Next Episode
Before this post we had an understanding of the technologies involved in this project as well as a bit of the process, but now that UX has done a bit of legwork we can better understand how to structure our project and the resulting software in a way that will better help the intended user to accomplish his job.
This ideally means a more productive user leading to more sales, a holiday bonus, happy bosses, and better profits for the company overall. Moving beyond this discussion, next week we will begin to explore how the work UX does can lead to UI implementation. This will cover what screens we might need to help John with his day-to-day activities as well as a navigation model that will allow him to move through the software in the most efficient manner possible. Stay tuned for more!
Evan Hutnick works as a Developer Evangelist for Telerik specializing in Silverlight and WPF in addition to being a Microsoft MVP for Silverlight. After years as a development enthusiast in .Net technologies, he has been able to excel in XAML development helping to provide samples and expertise in these cutting edge technologies. You can find him on Twitter @EvanHutnick.
Copyright © 2016, Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks or appropriate markings.