Part III: Why, When,
Download the easy to read PDF version (includes Trivia not in online version)
In parts one and two in this series on Ajax we examined in
page after an Ajax callback. We looked at some of the specific ways RadAjax and
ASP.NET AJAX handle Ajax operations and, in short, removed (or at least greatly
reduced) the mystery of how these frameworks do their magic.
In this installment, we’ll move past the “how” and “where”
of Ajax and start to look at the “why”, “when”, and “what” (I don’t think we
have any need to look at the “who”, so we’ll have to be satisfied with 4 of the
5 w’s). Why should you use Ajax in your web applications? When is it
appropriate to use Ajax? When is it not? What is the real value of adding Ajax to your application? What are the
To answer these questions we’ll start by looking at common
scenarios on the web that have benefited greatly from the use of Ajax. Then
we’ll explore when you should- and shouldn’t- use Ajax in your applications.
Finally, we’ll wrap up by comparing the data that is sent over the Internet
when you use Ajax callbacks instead of traditional page PostBacks to quantify
Why use Ajax?
Up to this point, we’ve assumed throughout this series that
you actually need or want to use Ajax, no questions asked. And for many of us,
that’s how we first added Ajax to our applications. We kinda knew what it was
(we’d used Google Maps, after all). We knew RadAjax made it very easy to add Ajax
to our applications. We knew it would make our applications “cool” and “Web
2.0-ish” (and impress the boss). So we embraced Ajax and ajaxified our
applications without much more deep consideration for why we should use it.
The most common benefits of Ajax are pretty easy to list:
While it is easy to measure how much bandwidth can be saved
by using Ajax (which we’ll do later in this article), it can be much more
difficult to quantify the benefits of “responsiveness” and “familiar UI”.
Fortunately, many have already tried to address this challenge by conducting research
to provide some level of expectation of the actual benefit derived from “soft”
concepts like responsiveness and familiarity.
One such attempt was made by Alexei White in an article
titled “Measuring the Benefits of Ajax”. In that article, White explains how
two identical applications- one built with traditional PostBacks and the other
with Ajax- were tested by a handful of users while their bandwidth and
productivity were measured. The results of White’s simple tests suggested the
Ajax application (on average) improved bandwidth performance by about 70% and
total task time by about 30%, which translates into over $10,000 in annual savings
(based on an assumed 36 second improvement on a task completed 50,000 times in
a year by a $20 per hour employee). Clearly, White’s research may not translate
directly your application, but it does provide significant evidence that the
simple process of ajaxifying your application can save your company (or
clients) thousands of dollars.Furthermore, with RadAjax in your toolbox, there are even
more reasons to add Ajax to your web application:
easy to ajaxify your application (no code changes necessary)
It’s very easy to remove Ajax from your application if you don’t like it
You have Best in Class support to help you solve
your Ajax problems
So whether you added (or are going to add) Ajax to your web
application because you thought it was “cool” or because you measured the
potential ROI like Alexei White, there should be no doubt that Ajax (even
simple implementations) can add lots of value your project.
When you should use
With tools like RadAjax and ASP.NET AJAX, it is not hard to
find places in your application that can benefit from instant ajaxification. In
general, any UX (short for “user experience”, a more holistic approach than “user
interface” or UI) in your application that does not involve navigation is a
good candidate for Ajax. Common examples of these interactions are:
that validates values with some server process
A drop down list that loads values in response
to another element’s action
Voting or rating input elements
Any grid operations (such as sorting, selecting,
editing, filtering, etc.)
It is important that you identify actions in your
application that can be ajaxified at a very granular level. In other words, if
you have a page on which most of the contents are updated after a PostBack,
applying Ajax to the page will not provide much (if any) benefit. Remember from
our earlier examination of Ajax in part’s one and two of this series that Ajax
is good at quickly updating small
portions of the page. If you apply your ajaxification too broadly, you’ll lose
many of the underlying benefits.
Let’s look at a practical example. Let’s say we have page
that conceptually looks like this:
If we decide to ajaxify all of the actions on this page that
normally use PostBacks, we might be tempted (especially if we’re using ASP.NET
AJAX UpdatePanels) to simply ajaxify the “asp:Panel”. After all, that would
automatically convert any action from the Treeview, Grid, or the Details View
into an Ajax Callback and allow those actions to update any of the other
controls in the Panel. Doing that, though, would probably eliminate most of the
value we could extract from Ajax.
Instead, we should focus on defining Ajax interactions that
update the fewest elements on the page as possible. For instance, if our Grid
has an event that updates the Details View, our goal should be to create an
Ajax action that updates only the
Details View and leaves all other controls (including the Grid) untouched. If
our Treeview loads nodes from the server as it is expanded, we should only
update the Treeview and no other control on the page to maximize our Ajax
benefits. The RadAjax Manager from Telerik (and the soon to be released Manager
for ASP.NET AJAX from Telerik) makes it very easy to define these granular
relationships and use Ajax in a way that adds value to your projects.
When you shouldn’t
Ajax is so easy to
add to applications these days, it is just as important that you know when not to use it as it is to when to use
it. While it improves many page interactions, the overhead and complexity that
Ajax can introduce to a page sometimes outweighs the potential benefits.
To understand when you shouldn’t use Ajax, it is important
that you understand some of the problems Ajax introduces into otherwise working
breaks This is probably one of the biggest challenges for applications that were
not designed with Ajax specifically in mind. Usability gurus will tell you that
the most used feature of any modern Internet browser is the back button and any
application that breaks it should be considered “unusable”. Applications
designed for Ajax overcome this limitation by using special tricks to populate
a browser’s History (thus re-enabling the back button) or by adopting a
single-page model that breaks the users “I need to go back” thought process.
cannot bookmark pages If you’re foolish enough to use Ajax for a site’s navigation (which I
obviously recommend against, unless you’ve fully adopted the single-page
application model), Ajax will also make it impossible for users to bookmark
pages in your application.
errors get lost Not properly handled with client-side code, unexpected server responses
during Ajax operations can result in the appearance of a “hung” application.
Sometimes extra consideration must be made when moving from PostBacks to Ajax
to properly redirect your users when an error occurs.
initial page load time If you think Ajax is designed to make your initial page load time faster,
you’re wrong. By its very nature, Ajax will likely increase your initial page
of the Ajax operations. This impact is usually relatively small when weighed
against the improved responsiveness on subsequent Ajax requests, but if your
page is relatively simple and the Ajax is providing relatively little value you
may want to consider if the page load penalty is worth it. (To be fair, browser
caching makes this less of an issue if you have other pages in your application
that use the same Ajax libraries, but something to consider nonetheless.)
index problems If you decide to use Ajax to load content in your application that may have
previously been loaded on the initial page load (for instance, ToolTip
content), remember that search indexers will not be able to see or index that
content. That means you need to be careful about using Ajax on content that is
key to your search indexing or you need to add code that automatically
recognizes a search engine crawler and serve a version of your page that
includes the Ajax content.
feedback breaks When you use PostBacks, users know the page is doing something when they
see the little loading graphic spinning in their browser. When you use Ajax,
this critical feedback that the page is working disappears. Fortunately,
products like RadAjax make this an easy problem to solve with easy to use
LoadingPanels that take the place of the browsers progress indicator.
Obviously, you shouldn’t rush into adding Ajax to your
application until you understand fully how each of these issues could
potentially affect your application’s performance and usability. You should
always make sure you have a good reason for adding Ajax to your application (or
page) and never add it simply because it looks cool. If you do, you may end up
running into one of these problems unexpectedly and creating more trouble than
What is the difference: PostBack vs. Callbacks
Here is where the rubber meets the road. So far we’ve
assessed in general terms why and when you should use Ajax, but all of that is
empty rambling if Ajax does not really
improve your page performance in a measurable way. To prove that Ajax makes a meaningful
difference, we’ll examine the bandwidth used and responsiveness of a sample web
page in three different scenarios:
Traditional PostBacks for all operations
RadAjax to ajaxify all operations
ASP.NET AJAX to ajaxify all operations
To conduct our test we’ll use a real world site:
converter.telerik.com. This online code converter from Telerik allows people to
easily convert VB to C# and C# to VB, and it is a perfect place to put our
scenarios to the test. Tests will be run by pasting a C# code snippet into the
Code Converter and then clicking the “Convert Code” button. Using IE 7 and
Fiddler, we will measure the size (in bytes) of the request and response for
each conversion, and we clear the browser cache before each set of tests. The test will be run for each of our three
scenarios, resulting in 18 data points (page load + 5 clicks for each
Since this is a single step process, measuring actual time
savings will be difficult. To measure time savings in your own tests, you should
design a test with multiple steps and try to find several users that you can
time as they complete the steps of your test. We don’t have that luxury for
this paper, so we’ll be focusing on primarily on the bandwidth savings Ajax
provides (or does it?).
After running all of our tests, logging the results, and
then averaging the request and response bytes for each scenario (PostBack,
RadAjax, and ASP.NET AJAX), we discover that Ajax does in fact deliver a huge bandwidth savings over traditional
PostBacks (see chart below). In the case of our Code Converter, the act of
simply switching from PostBacks to RadAjax callbacks (which we can do without
writing any code…but that’s another demo) reduced our average response size by
over 65%! If we look at the average
files have been cached), the improvement made by RadAjax is just shy of 90%.
That means the server has to send 90% less data over the Internet and the user
has to wait on 90% less data to arrive when the Code Converter uses RadAjax
instead of PostBacks.
In business terms, this experiment tells us that Ajax is a
real money saver. Let’s say the Code Converter processes 1000 conversion
requests a day and that the full PostBack response size of those pages is about
200KB. In a month’s time, the Code Converter could burn through 6GB of bandwidth with traditional
PostBacks. By implementing Ajax, though, we can cut that number to just 600MB. Scale that out for larger and more
popular sites and you can see how the savings really start to add up (especially for the users on the other end of that number, waiting for the response to
The comparison of RadAjax to ASP.NET AJAX, on the other
hand, was fairly equal. While the average ASP.NET AJAX response size with the
“first request penalty” (before caching) was 46KB and the RadAjax response was
about 51KB, the subsequent “post cache” responses were 19KB and 16KB on average
respectively (see figures below). The perceived responsiveness of ASP.NET AJAX
and RadAjax were the same for this test, but the RadAjax implementation was
much easier to configure and add to the application.
Page Size by Content Type and Scenario
These charts highlight some interesting facts about Ajax.
First, as I asserted earlier in this paper, Ajax does not make the page smaller
on the first uncached request. In fact, we can see both of the Ajax enabled
pages are noticeably larger (8% for ASP.NET AJAX and 27% for RadAjax). We see
that Ajax’s real benefit is in the subsequent page response size, which leads
us to interesting fact number two. Look at what’s missing from the second
RadAjax and ASP.NET AJAX charts. There are no HTML, image, or CSS “slivers” in
those responses (unlike the PostBack response). And even though there appears
of the JS being returned in the PostBack response has been cached in the Ajax
These tests clearly make the case for Ajax in the Code
Converter website. While your tests may not produce numbers that look exactly
like these, you should find that the general conclusions and comparisons remain
true. At the end of the day, the take away from these tests should be:
RadAjax and ASP.NET AJAX offer relatively
Regardless of which Framework you use, Ajax
definitely provides significant, measurable benefits over PostBacks.
Designing for Ajax
We’ve spent a lot of time talking about how you can convert
existing ASP.NET applications to Ajax-enabled applications in this paper, but
we haven’t addressed the scenario in which you design your application from the
ground up with Ajax in mind. If you have the luxury to design your application
from scratch, there are definitely lots of new interaction models that Ajax
enables you to use. With Ajax and a powerful set of UI controls (like Telerik’s
RadControls for ASP.NET), you can replicate almost any desktop interaction
model on the web, in all of the major browsers.
The benefits of modeling a web application after a desktop
application often manifest in the form of reduced training and support costs.
Users’ expectations for how interfaces should work are still largely influenced
by the time they spend on the desktop, especially by programs they use often
(like Microsoft’s Office). If you can provide experiences on the web that
support those expectations, you will have to spend less (not no) time training your users and your
users will likely be much more productive in a shorter period of time.
The reason I often glide past this approach to web
application design in these papers is because it is still hard for many
experienced web developers to think in the new terms of designing web
applications that feel like desktop applications. We have become so used to the
multi-page, form element model of designing pages that we simply overlook
opportunities to embrace a single-page application model that uses Ajax to
support context menus, menu bars, and the like. If you do step back, though,
and design an application that maximizes the power of Ajax, you can definitely
create applications that do much more with Ajax than simply turning PostBacks
Coming up next, we’ll shift our focus away from a general study
of Ajax and begin to look at ways you can specifically optimize RadAjax in your
applications. At this point you should have a complete understanding of what’s
going on under the hood of RadAjax and have a sense for the kind of measurable
value Ajax can provide. Now it’s time to take that knowledge and unleash it on
RadAjax to squeeze out the maximum performance gains.
As I near the end of this series, though, I want to make
sure I’ve addressed all of your unanswered questions about Ajax and RadAjax specifically.
If I’ve missed something along the way that you’d like to know more about,
please email your questions to me at todd.anglin[at]telerik.com. If I receive
enough questions, I’ll do a special “open mic” installment of the Ajax Papers
where I answer your questions. Until then, have fun testing your own
applications and telling your bosses how much money you’re going to save the
company by adding Ajax to your next project!
Todd Anglin, Technical Evangelist
White, Alexei. Developer.com. “Measuring the
Benefits of Ajax”. http://www.developer.com/java/other/article.php/3554271
Bosworth, Alex. SourceLabs.com. “10 Places You
Must Use Ajax”. http://www.sourcelabs.com/blogs/ajb/2005/12/10_places_you_must_use_ajax.html
ASP.NET AJAX. General use. http://ajax.asp.net
@toddanglin on Twitter
Copyright © 2017, Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
Progress, Telerik, and certain product names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and/or other countries. See Trademarks or appropriate markings.