Telerik Forums
Test Studio for APIs Forum
4 answers
265 views
Array/Dictionary as Variable.  So if we need to run a step say 10 times, it will records the 10 outputs in the array.  Right now we’d have to hardcode variable names.
Plamen Mitrev
Telerik team
 answered on 20 Feb 2019
6 answers
251 views

Ability to add a profile variable.  For each profile it has different values.  Then have a step to be able to switch profiles.

This would allow us to much easier change users instead of having the following variables as a simple example:

user1_username

user1_password

user2_username

user2_password

 


Plamen Mitrev
Telerik team
 answered on 19 Feb 2019
3 answers
222 views

On crash, provide option to not save and reload similar to the save and reload.  (very minor wish but was a pain when I kept crashing the app)


Plamen Mitrev
Telerik team
 answered on 19 Feb 2019
4 answers
231 views

Single Click instead of Double Click to navigate the test steps. 

Single clicking right now selects the step, but the right pane does not update to show the step.  So I edit the step thinking it was the one I clicked on.

Too easy to edit the wrong test step.


Plamen Mitrev
Telerik team
 answered on 19 Feb 2019
1 answer
72 views
I would like to be able to set variables as a step, directly from a string I provide rather than as a result of some other step.
Elena
Telerik team
 answered on 07 May 2018
1 answer
73 views
We have custom authorization (signed messages, etc) that require us to have access to the http method type, body, url, and some other things to properly sign each http request. I have this working for the most part but it would be a lot easier if I had access to get the members of a specific request. Maybe putting a code behind directly on a request step would work too? Whatever I'm doing is kind of hacky, that's for sure.
Oleg
Telerik team
 answered on 04 May 2018
1 answer
78 views

Hello!

Unfortunately your beta product of API testing has hit an early brick wall for me.  I am unable to use this to test my API's (without manually getting an auth token) because on our internal API the token route ONLY works if the POST body is sent using forms encoded fields.  If the content is raw text, the only option for the POST body right now, then our API rejects it as an invalid request, even if it is a well formed json object.

Yes this is our bad and the API should work with a raw text post as well and do some internal validation of the body before it tries to consume it, but being able to just switch the input type like PostMan would allow to do would get us as a test team running quicker.

 

Something to put on the wishlist - please give us some extra options in the body of the POST and other methods.

 

Thanks!

John
Telerik team
 answered on 19 Jul 2016
Narrow your results
Selected tags
Tags
+? more
Top users last month
Dominik
Top achievements
Rank 1
Giuliano
Top achievements
Rank 1
Dominic
Top achievements
Rank 1
Glendys
Top achievements
Rank 1
Iron
NoobMaster
Top achievements
Rank 2
Iron
Want to show your ninja superpower to fellow developers?
Top users last month
Dominik
Top achievements
Rank 1
Giuliano
Top achievements
Rank 1
Dominic
Top achievements
Rank 1
Glendys
Top achievements
Rank 1
Iron
NoobMaster
Top achievements
Rank 2
Iron
Want to show your ninja superpower to fellow developers?
Want to show your ninja superpower to fellow developers?