3 Answers, 1 is accepted
0
Hi Ricky,
As for now we do not plan exposing such a property, however we are interested about your particular scenario and why you need it. Currently as you mentioned you need to modify the rdContent CSS class.
All the best,
Petya
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions at the new Telerik Support Center
As for now we do not plan exposing such a property, however we are interested about your particular scenario and why you need it. Currently as you mentioned you need to modify the rdContent CSS class.
All the best,
Petya
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions at the new Telerik Support Center
0
Ricky
Top achievements
Rank 1
Rank 1
answered on 02 Jan 2008, 12:56 PM
Under DNN platform, a module (.ascx) can be directly integrated with RadDocks, implementing iGoogle-like gadgets. However, there are many DNN modules in my system are wider than the width specified by RadDocks so the extended part are cut off. Instead of re-implement a .ascx (just because of the size) accommodated to the RadDocks, I think Overflow-X is a useful workaround for this scenario.
Ricky.
Ricky.
0
Hello Ricky,
What skin for RadDock Prometheus are you using and what behavior do you get without modifying the css and what behavior would you actually like to have for overflow-x?
Sincerely yours,
Petya
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions at the new Telerik Support Center
What skin for RadDock Prometheus are you using and what behavior do you get without modifying the css and what behavior would you actually like to have for overflow-x?
Sincerely yours,
Petya
the Telerik team
Instantly find answers to your questions at the new Telerik Support Center