Hello there,
We have a simple requirement to have four panels docked to each side of a window (left, top, right, bottom) and have a splitter to be able to resize those user-controls.
One of our developers has come across an issue where once we resize the control and try and collapse the RadExpander, the effect is a fold in from the middle of the screen rather than the original effect.
From looking at it through SilverlightSpy, it seems that the RadExpander only resizes the container control after the splitter resizes it instead of the RadExpander when initially loaded.
I've created an example project for your reference, please excuse the colours/code... it's a very quick repro.
http://www.mediafire.com/?nmc48xordkhzraz
Telerik Version: 2011.1.419.1040 (we can't move to a new version yet!)
Try:
Any suggestions on mitigating this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
We have a simple requirement to have four panels docked to each side of a window (left, top, right, bottom) and have a splitter to be able to resize those user-controls.
One of our developers has come across an issue where once we resize the control and try and collapse the RadExpander, the effect is a fold in from the middle of the screen rather than the original effect.
From looking at it through SilverlightSpy, it seems that the RadExpander only resizes the container control after the splitter resizes it instead of the RadExpander when initially loaded.
I've created an example project for your reference, please excuse the colours/code... it's a very quick repro.
http://www.mediafire.com/?nmc48xordkhzraz
Telerik Version: 2011.1.419.1040 (we can't move to a new version yet!)
Try:
- Running the project and collapsing each panel
- Resize one of the panels and collapse/expand... notice the effect differs.
- Open SilverlightSpy and compare both instances of the RadExpander at expanded state and collapsed state after step two. You'll see that one has resized the container (the one that you resized) the other has resized the RadExpander (the one you left alone) in step 2.
Any suggestions on mitigating this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,