This question is locked. New answers and comments are not allowed.
We're working through our first 'proper' sprint and need some advice about best practice wrt User Stories and ownership.
ATM, a story is assigned to a developer who breaks it down in to a number of development tasks, s/he completes the tasks, recording the time taken. When the work is ready for test we assign the whole story to the test team lead who will, if necessary, reassign to someone in the test team and they will add the test cases and do what it is that they do. Once the tests are complete (and all passed) the story is marked as Done.
Now, as a practice I don't suppose that there is too much wrong with it, except the only team members with any work recorded against their names are members of the test team. This is what leads me, personally, to believe that we're not quite doing it right.
What is the "best practice" in this case?
--
Curious of Grantham
ATM, a story is assigned to a developer who breaks it down in to a number of development tasks, s/he completes the tasks, recording the time taken. When the work is ready for test we assign the whole story to the test team lead who will, if necessary, reassign to someone in the test team and they will add the test cases and do what it is that they do. Once the tests are complete (and all passed) the story is marked as Done.
Now, as a practice I don't suppose that there is too much wrong with it, except the only team members with any work recorded against their names are members of the test team. This is what leads me, personally, to believe that we're not quite doing it right.
What is the "best practice" in this case?
--
Curious of Grantham