This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.

New to Telerik - Upgraded to Q2'13 and references are off

2 Answers 18 Views
Installer and VS Extensions
This is a migrated thread and some comments may be shown as answers.
Jonathan
Top achievements
Rank 1
Jonathan asked on 12 Jun 2013, 06:51 PM
I'm brand new to using Telerik AJAX controls.  I updated today to Q2'13, my first upgrade.

After the installation, I ran the Upgrade Wizard on my project and got all Greens.

But now all of my pages show:

Parser Error Message: Could not load file or assembly 'Telerik.OpenAccess, Version=2013.1.219.3, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7ce17eeaf1d59342' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.


I'm sure there is something really simple that I am missing.  I had assumed it would update my references.

Is this normal behavior or am I missing something?  I find it hard to believe I have to update all the assembly references in my whole project.

Thanks for any help,
Newby

2 Answers, 1 is accepted

Sort by
0
Jonathan
Top achievements
Rank 1
answered on 12 Jun 2013, 07:12 PM
OK, false alarm.  

In case anyone else encounters the issue... I had to check all of the files out of source control.  I ran the update wizard 2 more times and got a couple more greens on some items.

Now, it appears to be working.
0
Biliana Ficheva
Telerik team
answered on 14 Jun 2013, 07:45 AM
Hello Jonathan,

Sorry for the late response.
I am glad that you managed to upgrade successfully your projects.
However do not hesitate to write whenever you experience any difficulties with our products. We will do our best to help.

Regards,
Biliana Ficheva
Telerik
If you want to get updates on new releases, tips and tricks and sneak peeks at our product labs directly from the developers working on the RadControls for ASP.NET AJAX, subscribe to the blog feed now.
Tags
Installer and VS Extensions
Asked by
Jonathan
Top achievements
Rank 1
Answers by
Jonathan
Top achievements
Rank 1
Biliana Ficheva
Telerik team
Share this question
or