Exception trying to mock UserProfileManager

2 posts, 0 answers
  1. Nathanael
    Nathanael avatar
    9 posts
    Member since:
    Oct 2010

    Posted 13 Aug 2013 Link to this post

    I'm trying to create a mock version of UserProfileManager in order to effectively unit test a Sharepoint 2010 Web Part
    Every time I run this code, I get the the exception being thrown below. I've verified that the feature works when I debug the code that calls UserProfileManager on the Sharepoint machine - two different Sharepoint machines, in fact.
    Here is the code in question:
    var _mockServiceContext = Mock.Create<SPServiceContext>();
    var _mockUserProfileManager = Mock.Create<UserProfileManager>(new object[] {_mockServiceContext});

    Unable to create instance of class SharePoint.MyWebPart.Test.MyTest. Error: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The trial period for this product has expired..
        at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfileManagerBase.ValidateLicensing()
       at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfileManagerBase..ctor(SPServiceContext serviceContext)
       at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ProfileManagerBase..ctor(SPServiceContext serviceContext, Boolean ignorePrivacy)
       at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileManager..ctor(SPServiceContext serviceContext, Boolean IgnoreUserPrivacy, Boolean backwardCompatible)
       at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileManager..ctor(SPServiceContext serviceContext)
       at Castle.Proxies.UserProfileManagerProxy..ctor(IEventsMixin, IMockReplicator, IMockMixin, IInterceptor[], SPServiceContext)
       at DynamicMethod_6f2d60ffa4f94cb4ba57556150461ef9(Object[])
       at “•.—.Ÿ.€()
       at “•.’•.Œ•[–](Func`1 ‹•)
       at “•.—.ˆ—(Type ‹, Object[] €)
       at –.”.(Type , List`1 ‘, Type Ž, Object[] “)
       at –.”.(Type Ž, Type[] , ProxyGenerationOptions Š“, Object[] “, IInterceptor[] )
       at Telerik.JustMock.Core.MocksRepository.Create(Type ‹, Object[] €, IEnumerable`1 ˆ–, IEnumerable`1 ‰–, IEnumerable`1 Š–, Type[] ‚–, Boolean ƒ–, Boolean €, IEnumerable`1 ˆ)
       at .‹–.Create(MocksRepository €–, Type ‹, Object[] –, Nullable`1 , Type[] ‚–, Nullable`1 ƒ–, IEnumerable`1 ˆ, List`1 ‰–, List`1 Š–, List`1 ˆ–)
       at Telerik.JustMock.Mock.›.’Ÿ()
       at “•.’•.Š•[–](Func`1 ‹•)
       at Telerik.JustMock.Mock.Create(Object[] args)

    Has anyone else seen this issuue?
  2. Stefan
    Stefan avatar
    198 posts

    Posted 14 Aug 2013 Link to this post

    Hi Nathanael,

    When you call the Mock.Create<T>(object[] args) overload, you essentially say that you want a loose mock but you still want the constructor of the mocked type to run. From the stack trace I see that it is in fact that constructor that throws the exception. Is that what you actually want? Because that's rarely useful.

    If you need a true loose mock it is best that you bypass its constructor. Basically, use the Mock.Create<T>() overload, like so:

    var _mockUserProfileManager = Mock.Create<UserProfileManager>();
    Let us
    var _mockUserProfileManager = Mock.Create<UserProfileManager>(); 
    know if you need help with anything else during your trial.

    Share what you think about JustTrace & JustMock with us, so we can become even better! You can use the built-in feedback tool inside JustTrace, our forums, or our JustTrace or JustMock portals.
  3. DevCraft R3 2016 release webinar banner
Back to Top